If I said it so poorly, why was it so easy for you to understand?

It's possible that she's telling the truth. It's also possible she's not. I don't know one way or the other, and neither does anyone else commenting on it.

You don't have to presume anyone innocent. And this judge doesn't have to do what you want.

Your non sequitur aside, plenty of people throughout history have seen no need for the presumption of innocence. It keeps them from getting what they want.

No, I'm talking about a legal ruling.

Nonetheless, we're talking about a legal ruling.

That's more like it.

You're free to call me any names you like. In fact, I encourage it.

And yet we're talking about a legal ruling.

So my replies are being detected as spam because I'm not calling people names.

It's okay to call people rude names because you don't like them.

I'd say that an accusation of a crime is not proof of the crime. Presumption of innocence is a whole thing that exists and stuff.

I'm sure that name-calling is a good way to convince people of the righteousness of your cause.

You're doing both.

Alleged abuser. But keep pretending a contract isn't a contract.

Nothing makes people more empathetic than being scolded.

A contract is a contract. I'm very sure that's the case.

Except she doesn't have to work with him personally. She just has to abide by the contract she signed.

I don't know if he burned out or what, but I was bummed when his output dropped off. Glad to see he's back at it, however sporadically.

I was amazed that they managed to top themselves in season 2. I'd rather they went out with a bang than a whimper. I, too, hope for Forrest's death.