renren9000
RenRen
renren9000

It's very possible that you're not immunologically responding to the vaccine. Some people are like that. Also, we're using technology from the 1930s on these vaccines. (We need a game-changer.) Depending on the type, dose, and your age, your chance at responding may be very small. It's better than nothing, though, and

Good luck with that. About 30% of the population gets the shot every year, and most are repeat vaccinators. If the government wanted to track us all, and all the time, they would find a way to hack a tracking device that we all want, all carry, and just happens to look like an iPhone.

Thank you for this.

They cause what? And who are you?

None of the things you mention have been shown to protect from influenza. Even the most well-nourished, most healthy person can get it and have a rough time of it. The reason we vaccinate is not selfish, it's for the community. A healthy person may not get it, but they can still carry it and give it to the

Bad Doctor. Bad. Bad. Bad.

It is "really that bad." I've investigated too many deaths in pediatric patients (too young to be vaccinated). I have an allergic reaction to people who cavalierly state that it's not that bad. It is. That's why we have vaccines for it.

I'm trying to articulate Goyer's. And, yes, you know it's bad. What if you killed someone? You'd really know how bad it is, and, given your baseline morals about it, you'd probably grieve hard over having to do it.

That was kind of weird to me, because I've seen people die from lesser falls. (Then again, it's a movie.) But, yeah, he doesn't have to kill you, but he can hurt you. (And he doesn't have to save you, either.)

Charlie Jane, you're thinking that time is linear and constant. One season could be one really long week (or 24 hours) in the life of Jim Gordon.

We saw a hint of the "no kill" rule, from the point of view of Nolan and his friends, in Batman Begins and again in The Dark Knight Rises. In BB, he just didn't kill because he had seen that killing led to more killing. It was a vicious circle. In TDKR, "Robin" shoots a bad guy and then throws away the gun in horror.

Now playing

This is a very good discussion on why killing Zod was a choice that had to be made, and some criticism of the movie overall.

I will now claim that island for myself through the cunning use of flags.

Do you have a flag?

If you notice, I was responding to yours. (We can do this all night.)

This is the same guy that proclaimed HIV cured because one person had his entire immune system irradiated, then given heavy antiretrovirals, then had a bone marrow transplant from a close relative, then more antiretrovirals, and then, after months of suffering through all that, didn't have any detectable virus levels

If you notice, we don't see that he didn't program that different finger already.

And we have evidence that he didn't already program that finger and is just, you know, giving us the finger?

And all is right in Jesus' world again. Here, he probably thought he'd have to go a year before he could trash Apple again.

Yes, I'm guilty of making some assumptions. But I can only assume in this instance with the limited information I have.