Ok. How about this?

Go ahead and throw the asterisks on there after the fact. You got the point. 7.7s is not blistering in the terms of cars. You could throw around limits until anything is an accolade. My Volvo is the fastest car in my city*.

A 7.7s 0-60 is only “blistering” before the mid 90s.

Im going with

I’ll be rooting for BMW then Kevin Estre then Chevrolet, then the rest of the 911s then the 488s(even the SMP ones) and then The Fords in GTLM. Call me a terrorist hahah.

Yeah. It looks pretty bad at that angle.

All they did was change title sponsor this time. The Grand-Am/ALMS merger was a whole different ball game. Idk if your dvr will still record it though.

Well you clicked on it. Mission accomplished here.

It is mainly only done on rallies.

I haven’t been banished to the greys for something you have said you can’t really talk. You get stuck there for weeks or months after being on Jalopnik for years. It is the ultimate definition of frustrating.

Chrysler won’t do this. They are not that stupid. That would be burning money.

Racing fuel is fuel. Drinks are fuel. Racing fuel is a drink. Don’t be a kill joy. The math is there, and it checks out.

Darwin wins every time.

1. I am not talking about straight line speed. I am talking about track and overall performance.

No where in the title does it say for a certain price.

Very true.

Haha It is good to find common ground.

You do not need to mod a pony car to start taking on Porsches.

Fuck. Them.

Performance bargain means literally speed/dollar. You want high track performance and low cost.