It’s definitely not a take I expected. But it’s legit because his wife is a feminist! He asked one feminist so that’s definitely what it means! Don’t worry about the actual author’s statement of what it means or the eleventy billion other people who have read it! This one feminist says it’s a rape fantasy, so it must…

No, they should continue with the no-sex having. No sex for them. Wall of that section of the gene pool and let that shit just drain the fuck down.

Since when aren’t people allowed to post questions in a discussion forums​, and sites such as Jezebel? Check every single article posted for the past two weeks​. I guarantee you that you will find at least one question posed by one of the readers​ directly related to said article, questions that are otherwise easily…

“To Trump, a joke is not so much an opportunity to lighten the mood as it is an opportunity to remind his allies that he can humiliate them at any moment.” 

No, this isn’t transactional. She didn’t get anything in exchange for the “service”.

What happened was coercion. That’s what makes it a sexual assault.

Ultimate punishment for Trump? He is able to view himself exactly how everyone else sees him.

Zakat is charity, which is normal when you can give back you should. It is a basic human requirement. How on earth can you compare charity to enriching the freakish Scientology fat cats like Miscavige? Srsly?

I think the issue is that there’s clearly something really wrong here - possibly an assault, possible sexual extortion, clearly a theft and a woman who was traumatized. And there’s nothing to be done about it. Meaning these men may force another woman to perform sexual acts after they steal something from her because…

Also, if the person whose consent is being questioned isn’t sure if they consented.....THEY DIDN’T FUCKING CONSENT.

Yeah, they dissolved just recently.

lol. Clintonistas? It’s time to tone down your internet consumption, homie. What the hell are you talking about? I don’t think Clinton is infallible. I acknowledge her faults. I suggest you do the same for Bernie. The hatred you seem to have for Clinton is exactly my point about that cult vibe Bernie’s hardliners…

“A man accustomed to wealth and its trappings, Trump has embraced life in the Executive Mansion, often regaling guests with trivia about the historic décor,” The Associated Press reports.

Not to pile on (Wait, I’m doing exactly that. Whatever.), but what you and some others call “purity bullshit” or a “100% perfect” “unicorn” candidate some of find to be just the absolute minimum. And if a candidtade doesn’t meet the absolute minimum, we’re all fucked anyway, so we might as well let the worse…

Thank you so much for the mansplaining here! I had no idea that this had happened! My pretty little head couldn’t have even bothered to know about this until you showed me the light!

HE is lucky enough to live in a state where HIS partner had access to an abortion. HE wouldn’t be quite so dismissive of the importance of women’s bodily autonomy if HE were a woman.

I’m sure there is push back against Mello and his anti-choice past alone.

Fine, but I’m not debating about who has the better position. I’m pointing out that it seems to be impossible for people to discuss Sanders without bringing up Clinton. Why do we have to bring up Clinton when we discuss Sanders? Why bring up Clinton at all? Is it possible to discuss Sanders without bringing up…

It’s amazing how people continue to blame Hillary for supporting a bill that SANDERS VOTED YES ON. Don’t slam one without slamming the other. That’s the hypocrisy that people are upset about, especially when she has repeatedly apologized for the superpredators comments since. And Goldwater Girl when you’re 17 and then…

Hilary Fucking Clinton does not need to establish her pro-choice bona-fides with you or anyone else. Bernie “I don’t believe in identity politics” Sanders however has a lot to prove to demonstrate he can or will do anything more than name post offices.

My big issue with the Mello thing is how it relates to Orsoff and what that says about the biggest problem with progressive purity tests: who designs the test? Because whoever does the designing is going to be biased, no matter what.