relpor
Relpor
relpor

This is bad Lifehacking

No mention of the fact that a former gawker writer sam biddles name apparently appeared on the list?

You’re One Of Them Little, Uh, Fancy Lads, Aren’t Ya? With David Letterman

Nested comments may be dying in some parts of the internet, but in other parts they are absolutely essential. As TaumpyTearrs mentions in another column, in discussion communities where multiple conversations between relatively well-known personalities follow their own courses across a single article’s discussion

“Just one more click” Unless you have 15 notifications. Then its 15 clicks, and 15 new windows, instead of simply being able to see what comment someone upvoted, or being able to see which comment they were responding to and upvote or reply to them without ever leaving the notifications screen. It also usually takes

Hey look, it’s Ernie the Kinja Tech’s secret identity!

No, Kinja is bad. It’s almost impossible to follow a conversation now. That’s literally the only change that needs made to make it useable. But it’s a big deal. I was one of those people who just didn’t understand why everyone was freaking out before the changeover, but it didn’t take me long to see what the problem

I know the difference between better and worse. Kinja is worse than disqus. Which, yes, makes it very bad.

I know the difference between better and worse. Kinja is worse than disqus. Which, yes, makes it very bad.

Kinja is several orders of magnitude worse.

This is demonstrably not true in terms of commenting at least. I understand the back end is easier to use but the front end is garbage in a hot diarrhea sauce with a vomit glaze.

Ostensibly leftist journalists, pundits, and think piece writers who somehow almost exclusively attack the American left and rarely the America right. They offer token attacks at some more radical elements on the right, but spend more time obsessing over bad tweets and opinions of random liberals.

I don’t really see them as alt-right.

That, plus the author’s own explanation in the NY Times interview that his ‘true character’ was revealed in those texts, while Margot’s mistakes were borne of positive character traits like empathy and imagination, really soured me on the whole thing.   Any nuance appears to have been accidental.

I just kind of think that the text buildup and the “whore” at the end, while being a thing that DOES happen irl, went a little far to make Robert the villain of the piece. I would have preferred it left off so people were forced to just think about where they fell without being told who the bad guy was.

I’d feel the

I think a lot of the male responses are more responses to what women are writing about it.

I guess this is the future of blogging, but an entry by itself that comprises links, without actual content, tells me nothing.

What fools we were! Oh, if only all us here at the AV Club would’ve listened to your words of wisdom back whenever the fuck it is you’re talking about, America wouldn’t be in this mess right now!