redyelloworanj
redyelloworanj
redyelloworanj

Can I just say how completely baffled I am by how many people are responding with, "Well they should just figure it out! If they don't, there's something wrong with them!" Really? There's something wrong with THEM? First off, totally ableist, guess you've never dated someone with Asperger's. Secondly, you're the

"She tipped her head back in ecstasy as she reached climax, writhing and moaning in ecstasy as the waves of pleasure rolled over her. Sweat rolled down the length of her body and she sighed in pleasure.

I kind of hate phones in all capacities be it texting or talking. Like, just court me via letters or cakes delivered to my doorstep, k?

Not to say women don't do this, but so do men. Love them, but really don't like the idea strongly conveyed that women do this and men don't.

Hey guys! I just figured out what IRL means. I feel so hep and groovy.

Nope, slow-fade is not acceptable. Healthy communication means being upfront with the other person in the relationship, instead of deliberately obfuscating your intentions and then throwing a hissy-fit when they don't have superhuman mind-reading powers and figure out that you mean the exact opposite of what you said.

Two sides to every story. I've been on a few dates where I saw craptacular behavior*. I was just...done. Finito. End. No more. When the guy would text me back, I figured I'd be rewarding his craptacular behavior with a response. If he can't figure out that it didn't go well, then he's got bigger issues and an

It makes me feel...

But people were nonstraightforward and did the slow fade long before text messages were a thing. Ie, phone convo: do you want to hang out this weekend? eh no, I have plans. Next weekend? I'll check and get back to you.

I just need one called How to Make Your Cat Show She's Sorry. I love ya cat, but you're a bit unrepentant about puking on my floor.

I teach high school-level Read180, which is Scholastic's remedial reading program. The (ridiculously expensive) program comes with a whole library of high-interest books for struggling readers, and I'm almost positive that the boy's version is included — at least, the list of chapters sounds very familiar. Here's the

I'm sitting here with my male counterpart and he's just complaining that none of the "boy" books are practical.

Aaaand this is why I wanted to be a boy and not a girl when I was a kid.

That bookstore employee is lucky she had the level of autonomy at her job that she did. I certainly did not at my job at a large chain bookstore. I think my store manager might have had that much freedom, but I'm not 100% sure of even that.

How to Handle Becoming Rich

For Boys:
How to avoid being an entitled, sexist douchebag.
For Girls:
How to survive in a patriarchal society.

It is interesting because some of the "Girls Only" titles - Top Tips for Speech-making, How to Beat Bullies, How to Survive Shyness - sound like practical social topics for BOTH girls and boys. I will 100% guarantee that more boys would benefit from learning how to overcome shyness or handle a confrontation with a

ugh. why can't these subjects be merged together and the book be republished as I don't know "Boys and girls: how to survive almost anything!"

Because obviously only boys are involved in plane crashes, tornadoes, forest fires, floods, etc. I mean, women never leave the kitchen, so how could they possibly be involved in a plane crash?

Now playing

How to Survive a T-Rex doesn't make sense. What is it that a person is supposed to survive? Is it simply their existence? I think I know who the audience is: