Well, leaving a child alone in a car has been known to kill the child, so yes: Kim Brooks should have been arrested and fined an unreasonable amount of money.
Well, leaving a child alone in a car has been known to kill the child, so yes: Kim Brooks should have been arrested and fined an unreasonable amount of money.
I'm not the person the question was directed at, but I do feel that this should be the case. Everyone should be forced to donate blood, bone marrow, organs and anything else while alive or dead.
Except all the time and money put into the official English translation will be a loss since they will lose out on English sales.
It has never been brought up. Its last appearance was a time-travel episode in season six, in which Dean uses the gun but leaves it behind so that it could continue its path to be used by them in their past present.
Except it takes away money from the official release(s) and translators.
Didn't you hear? They're releasing the game now.
Don't pirate, asshole.
To me, either phrase would indicate class, but (like I said) it's a matter of debate.
There is some debate within the fandom about what Lucifer meant, be it classes or individuals, but he said "things," which seems to indicate the former.
There is some debate within the fandom about what Lucifer meant, be it classes or individuals, but he said "things," which seems to indicate the former.
I don't really hold any of the seasons following the first five to the same standard set by Kripke. Even season six was remarkably close to the spirit of the show.
Is it so strange that the Colt cannot kill angels, who are essentially gods in their own right? Angels hadn't even been seen on earth for thousands of years before and over a hundred years after Samuel built the gun. He would have had no lore to use in fashioning a gun that could kill them as well.
It would have been even better had they ended the teaser with the Cyberdemon's chilling howl.
The gamepad is the best controller for Mario Kart 8. The Pro controller and nunchuk/wiimote combo aren't even close.
Yes, and one of those judges thought it was human. The other two didn't.
I want to thank you for fighting this point. It's literally disgusting to me, as a parent, to see others argue that leaving their children in the car alone is somehow their "right" and that not doing so will somehow hurt their independence.
And you very well could have been kidnapped, raped and murdered. Children at that age should not be allowed to walk on their own anywhere.
So, you're glad that people won't be able to see when you leave your child in the car alone?
"wait and see if the parent came back within a decent amount of time."
You're defending a woman who left her baby in a car for at least ten minutes?