redactedservercountess
RedactedServerCountess
redactedservercountess

Are you outright taking the entire game in its full form without paying for it? Then, no, you are not stealing.

You described a very specific scenario. You can't just offer up a different scenario as some sort of counter-point.

Except if I intended to sell that piece of paper I can now no longer sell it to you because you stole it. You stole potential money from me, leaving me with a product with diminished value.

No one will ever be able to convince me that this is not stealing.

I actually do feel that way about Jackson as Fury as well as Johansson as Black Widow. Johansson is probably the most jarring of the two, though. She cannot carry that role.

I watched the The Avengers and felt that way about Jackson as Fury. He was poorly cast.

No Red/Blue/Yellow or even Green/Red version of Pokémon can be corrupted from an encounter with MissingNO, nor will a save file be deleted. All that occurs is a temporary distortion of the game's visuals and a permanent distortion of the Hall of Fame.

I've always had a huge fascination with glitches in the Pokémon games, although I wish these artists wouldn't further (or insinuate) the myth that either MissingNO. or 'M block destroy the games.

Probably. I've interacted with him before in regards to my work on the PokéGods.

Definitely in a good way. Probably the best "real" interpretation of the coveralls that anyone could have hoped for.

The definition of an aphorism just seems to be too broad to be used in any meaningful context.

I did Google it even before posting my comment, but I shouldn't have had to.

Why don't you bother to actually explain what an aphorism is?

I just can't wrap my mind around why the writers/showrunners would ever think that anyone wanted Ted and Robin to happen.

Rowling outlined the epilogue. She has gone on record that she revised it once the narrative actually caught up.

I don't understand how anyone can rationalize the theft of any property. It's literally ruining various industries.

Are you suggesting that they should not have charged Rennie with murder? She was very clearly engaging in activities that resulted in the death of her child.

Season five was the end of the arc, if not the series itself. It doesn't count.

I agree with you, even though a few others refuse to acknowledge your rational, researched points.

Please don't respond to posts I made over a year ago.