What a brave response. 

SO BRAVE

What an intelligent response that definitely means something. 

You should copy and paste this nonresponse a few more times.

Yeah this doesn’t seem like a money grab at all. She must be so distraught and traumatized because someone jerked off near her while she was asleep 25 years ago.

This is borderline unreadable, and a great example of why developmentally disabled people shouldn’t be allowed to post online. 

“It makes me happy that an autistic man was bullied by activists because he refused to agree that 1+1=3. I’m SUCH a good person. Everyone in the world owes it to me to support my delusions.”

“But anyway, so trans women are delusional, invalid pervert criminals and the law should stop them from being in spaces with real women...”

That’s an insane/absurd/objectively incorrect assertion. And you should be embarrassed if you actually think that’s true.

Oh, so she said that she would:

None of what you’ve written here has any bearing on anything I wrote.

Who the fuck cares? 

“Yeah, and 70 years ago nothing David Duke said would be considered controversial.”

And of course your definition of “being kind to strangers” is housing sex offenders who suddenly decide they’re trans in women’s prison?

Most of the people who advocate for this stuff are autistic so they arguably aren’t able to do that. 

Until recently it was the active policy of the British government to house self identified trans women in women’s prisons. The policy changed recently due to public outcry after a high profile rape occurred. There are many other examples.

Yeah you’re doing some real calculus here.

Yes. She’s been very specific in fact.

So many of the things that you say are just weird fantasies about how you clearly wish the world was.

How would you have any insight into how someone you don’t know and have never met would feel about something?