so this is why your sites don’t have editors

Hey Univision, how about this:

My ex boyfriend was catty, former male roommates have been quite gossipy. A male acquaintance is both. Not all people are catty and gossipy. SOME women are, SOME men are. I have used specific examples. You are using “men” and “women” in your argument, as absolutes.

There are certain men in my life who I definitely describe as catty and gossipy, BECAUSE THEY ARE.

I used an accurate description of the women in my office. There are people in the world who have these personality/behavioral traits. The people in my office who have them happen to be women.

There wasn’t anything women-blamey about using a specific example to poke holes in a blanket statement. I was pointing out the behavior of people I know. If we women can’t handle that, then something is wrong.

Dear god, I called the women IN MY OFFICE catty, etc. Because they are. How do you not understand that I did not call all women that?

I’m being sexist because I reported how things are at my workplace? ROTFL. FFS, no one expected thm to be that way bc of their gender. They are that way bc they choose to be that way.

In my workplace, the women are the most horrible catty two-faced gossips, so, not convinced that one gender is more likely to be good if the power were balanced between the two. (I am a woman).

Can’t wait for all the people that will dismiss this because our society still views raping men as funny. 

Uggghhhhhhhnnnnfff. This is why I hate it when people say, “Women should be in charge of everything.” Nope. Women can be shitty too.

Never, EVER underestimate Splinter’s desire to bite off their nose to spite their face.

Well sure, anyone can win an argument if you’re going to start using “facts” and “logic.”

Jesus fuck, I hope you didn’t go to school to learn how to write this shit. 

As others have said, McRaven essentially telling Trump to get fucked sideways is a huge deal. As a general rule, service members of every branch are allowed to have whatever political opinions they wish, but they are not allowed to express them while in uniform (largely because this could be interpreted as speaking for…

Splinter: Acting like Stroppy Toddlers at Things We Don’t Understand Since 2016

This is honestly the most naive piece in a growing body of naiveté I’m seeing from you. Criticism of America’s fetishism for its military is certainly warranted but this op-ed is a HUGE deal, for its elevating the danger of silencing critics and to Trump’s base who respect McRaven, and should be reported as such.…

It’s really disheartening that you you don’t realize the second level of responsibility and understanding people like McRaven and other uniformed defense industry people have to bear. That you don’t realize so many of them agree with you, but can’t do anything because they have to prioritize their own voice lower in…

“The Media”

This just seems like rambling to me.