I will say, in regards to a parliamentary system (which is something I myself wanted for quite a while), to think on this one thing.

Sure I agree with many of Jill Stein’s issues too. Mainly because they didn’t ask me if I think Jill Stein a vote-pandering idiot who will say anything to get more than 1.2% of the vote (unless of course Jill is honest and answers yes to that question as well.)

Billy is without a doubt the worst sportswriter at Deadspin. If you’re not going to fire him, at least appoint an editor. The man has never met a run-on sentence that he hasn’t liked.

I find that site less than helpful in terms of accurately representing the candidates positions. Particularly when it pretends Trump actually has policy positions.

Billy your opinions are so consistently wack that I have a hard time believing you work for a site I love so much. Remember that article you wrote about how athletes shouldn’t have opinions? That was the worst! And this is even worse than that! Does everyone at Deadspin hate you?

For the “holding your nose” contingent, has there ever been a major party nominee for President who you were excited to vote for because of their proposed policies?

I’ve put hours into contemplating it. It would be AWESOME because it would take the election out of the hands of po-dunk rednecks in places like North Florida and Iowa, and get back to one person, one vote. Who the fuck would care how the people of New Hampshire voted, except for the fact that they’re a swing state…

You’re that guy, got it.

Yes.

Donald Trump slapped his second-most slappable son, who was wearing a Yankees shirt at the time?

This article is nothing more than part of a schmear campaign.

Execution seems like an overreaction. I prefer a policy that just lox ‘em up.

she may be pro vaxx but she uses very carefully formulated words to pander to the anti vaxx crowd

But she is clearly skeptical of vaccinations, or at least wants people to think she is. She’s not a clear anti-vaxxer, but she has no problem attracting them by mentioning “legitimate questions” people have regarding vaccines. Either way, it’s a shitty position to take.

This article didn’t say anti-vax. It said vaccine skeptical, which is a pretty fair (if not charitable) description of the position as best as you can make out from her waffling positions. Another, more apt description might be “anti-vaccine panderer.”

Exactly. A friend actually said to me the other day, “Eh, we survived eight years of George W, so...” Yes, but despite all his numerous faults I never feared the destruction of mankind because of a Twitter slight from him either.

Well, she’s a white entitled idiot who won’t be affected if Trump wins so, OF COURSE SHE DOES.

Damn it, that attitude is fucking dangerous. Hillary is not safe. She has not been elected. The polls are uncomfortably close, and encouraging people to pull this morally pure shit plays right into Donald’s teeny hands.

If you’re a Sanders supporter, and he is a Clinton supporter, shouldn’t you currently be supporting the excutive branch candidate that he thinks will best help him accomplish his legislative branch goals?