You mean the Super Bowl XXV, XXVI, XXVII, and XXVIII Champion Buffalo Bills?

I think you've taken what I've said the wrong way. I said it would be easier for an ESL language person to understand because it's pared down and lacks grammatical nuance. Have you spoken a language like Japanese? It often omits words that a language like English includes for grammatical reasons.

Coffee? You buy, I'll fly!

Regular Joe has a comment: ahh, ya know, let the big muckety mucks work it out, what do I know???

That was my thought exactly.

They both seem to be going in opposite directions, with the first adding a superfluous word that causes confusion and the second entirely omitting words, leading to more confusion. Judging by the number of people in this thread complaining about the meanings of these, I don't think you have to be 'dense' to not…

I'm going to have to disagree with you. The 'anymore' one renders the sentence nonsensical by adding a superfluous word that muddles the meaning of the sentence. 'The car needs washed' turns 'washed' into either a potential noun or wrecks the tense of the verb. What is a 'washed' and why does the car need one?

That's the one that set me off, as well as the 'washed' one. Both commit the sin of making the sentence less intelligible. I'd like to think that I'm a descriptivist instead of a prescriptivist; language is fluid and should be screwed around with if needed, but only if it makes things easier to understand. Those two…

I like that she says 'I dream of simplicity' while wearing a Matthew Lesko-style leather jacket emblazoned with dollar signs.

He is grease in human form.

Ha, in your meandering post, you agreed with me several times but still found the need to lecture me, grandstand about your intelligence, straw-man me, denigrate my intelligence, and then, despite writing a ton, dismiss me in the end. It's like the internet distilled into one post.

Get ready to go through the looking glass here, people:

It's one of the few shows where I can sort of turn off certain parts of my brain and just enjoy what's going on. Like you said, we ultimately know where Jimmy is going (and in a few episodes, you can kind of tell where the plot is going), but that's not really all that important. It's about the characters (and the…

The Emmys will somehow shoehorn in Jim Parsons and the entire cast of Modern Family into that category and there won't be any room for Odenkirk.

If Chuck had allowed Jimmy into HHM, he'd probably never have turned into Saul Goodman. Now, I anticipate him fully embracing his 'Slippin Jimmy' past and fully taking Chuck's words about not being able to change to heart.

Yep. He was warehouse worker Nate in the later seasons.

I took the cell phone line as Jimmy mocking Chuck's 'condition'. I heard a lot of sarcasm in that line reading.

Let's ask the Dancing Itos!

But hasn't he already not been able to do that without irritating everyone around him enough to the point of the show ending?

What does Daniel-san from Karate Kid think? Bill??