This whole article screams projection:

To him it was "making love", to her it was simply fucking. The two are as different as a kiss you give your mom vs a kiss you give to your love.

People call Nick a sociopath, but who fakes feelings for someone when you already made your mind up that you like the Hot Failed Athlete? When she told him she was never in love with him, THAT was below the belt. Why sleep with him then if you're sooo in love with someone else and you know this guy is not going to…

That made me out the biggest HA! last night. The entire relationship was for the cameras. You refused to see him in person TWICE. That was your chance to keep things private, asshole.

So you think they should say fucking on ABC? Awesome, are you 12?

Sometimes I fucking hate the over-the-top feminism on display at Jezebel. I can't understand the idea of "slut-shaming" in regards to this story. I do not watch the show but can appreciate the detailed recap of this relationship. Why, because this man is hurting and therefore speaking out of that hurt and anger,…

He was on national TV, was he supposed to say fucking?

Why is that?

Cry all you want Nick. Andi won this round.

It's Jezebel. You have to throw in the "slut-shame" buzzword in order to get an article about "women" and "sex" published.

I agree with you. I have to be honest and admit I watched this entire season *I know, I am embarrassed*. I think Nick is a very sensitive and caring person. He truly opened up to her and thought that they were forming a real relationship with huge potential. I do not think he asked that question as a way of making her…

I don't think he was trying to slut shame her. I think he was asking why she would do that, knowing how he felt about her, because it would give him hope, or he felt lead on by that. He was clearly vulnerable to her and cared about her a lot. If the roles were reversed I know I wouldn't want to feel like a notch on…

Or you could just do it old school.

Man, how many times in your life do you wish you could play the tape back and prove someone wrong like that?

Who cares? If you think that the lesson of 9/11 is that we should turn the date into a tragedy-porn taboo, then you're the one with the problem.

time to get over 9/11. seriously, not everything that has a burning building is reference to 9/11, been over a decade, lets go ppl, get ovr it.

I REALLY hate how sensitive the world is. The building exploding isn't a 9/11 reference. It's exploding because it's a poster for a Michael Bay movie. So cry me an ocean, and remove the sand from your vaginas and use it as a beach. You'll feel better. Now there's something else for someone to cry about.

So no movie can ever use burning buildings in posters again? It's not even clear that it's a NY building, there's just plain sky in the background. I'm not even getting into the date coincidence because being mad about that it's just stupid.
C'mon guys, it's been 13 years already.

Also heard about many "fangirls" who all slept with the staff. So much douchey WWF and WWE talk it got old. He tried to do his own little behind the scenes show with the staff and it was very poor. The prep for the show was basically to print every headline from ESPN. He just went article to article and read the title…

I think the article made the point pretty clearly that this clip was dated. There's no insinuation that this was recent, actually quite the opposite.