Cowherd is so difficult to even hate-listen to. I only hear him for 5-10 minutes on the radio every day as I go to lunch, but I had to stop because every time I'd catch a snippet of him, I would be in a bad mood throughout the rest of my lunch break. He has a knack (I'm not going to give him credit for being smart…

Exactly. Like I said, 81% of his hits in his prime (9 years) were singles. If he was so ridiculously powerful, why weren't there more doubles?

Well then I guess Ichiro doesn't understand player value. In his prime (2001-2010) he averaged 9 HR per season over 678 ABs (one every 75 ABs) while batting .331. His slugging % over that time was .430. 81% of his hits were singles. He could have taken a lot of points off his average if it meant 20-25 more HR per…

That always seemed like myth-making bullshit to me. If a guy is capable of hitting 40 HR and isn't, then he's either a moron who doesn't understand player value (or his coaches are), or he's a stubborn dickhead who is only trying to pad specific personal stats. I don't doubt that he could have hit around 15-20 HR per…

I am a hetero male, and the article headline is the exact opposite of my thinking. Cardigans are hot, is what I'm saying. 'I hate hollywood' is something else I'm saying.

And by the way, the headline is not correct. It is, as I said before, misleading. He was not suspended for 'pot smoking'. He was suspended for violating the NFL's substance abuse policy multiple times. In this particular case, it was not for 'pot smoking', it was for driving while under the influence of pot. You know,…

No, you didn't read what I wrote. You accused me of focusing solely on the factually incorrect part of the article. My first sentence and second-to-last clearly show my position on the 'most important thing' about the article. You bulldozed past that in order to snark me, and are under the impression that I wrote what…

Shut the fuck up. It was clear s/he was joking. This article isn't about you. If you want to make it about you, write in. Don't get all pissy just because you're hypersensitive.

Can you read? I agree with the fucking article. I just feel like, given the severity of the issue, the author should be striving for accuracy. Jesus. I guess we're only allowed to comment on 'the most important thing' about each individual article and not care at all about accuracy in reporting. Seriously, actually…

I definitely think Rice should be suspended for longer, but this article is pretty disingenuous, and I feel like it is on purpose. It's telling that you're not linking to a story about the 'player who tested positive for marijuana during the offseason' being suspended for 16 games. I'm assuming you're talking about…

In addition to him being a huge asshole and a smarmy douchebag (I'm seriously wondering how so many in this thread are confused that people are calling him this; go google it, there are a million examples), his supporters are always so weirdly defensive of him. KO's 'baseball knowledge makes the head reel'? Nope.…

Thanks! You're the best!

I was wondering the same thing! I hope the few naysayers who continually post 'these are all fake!!!' haven't had any effect on the feature.

Given the amount that teenagers sext each other, makes you wonder how many of these guys passing around nude pictures are in fact distributing child porn to each other (whether knowingly or not).

You're awfully contradictory. You immediately tell everyone to 'shut the fuck up' and follow that up two sentences later by telling everyone that they're entitled 'to comment or not'. You're telling everyone that they have the choice to be here and read articles and comment, then you're telling everyone to 'just leave…

This is one of the stupidest fucking articles I've ever read. You're holding someone to a ridiculous standard when you don't (and probably won't, and further, maybe even can't) know any of the pertinent details of the incident. It absolutely is important what the truth is, because if he's right, it invalidates…

They only settled on Chipotle after Michael's brother Pete turned them away from the Little Caesar's he manages.

You've clearly been reading for a while, though, since you've come up with a '90% obvious bullshit' statistic.

Your post demands it. You have an issue with 90% of the stories on this feature, yet you're clearly coming back every week and complaining. What else should one say to you?

I guess what is not 'obvious bullshit' is that gun to your head that is forcing you to read them every week and then comment on your stoic cool cynicism as it relates to the stories. You are an amazing person, please teach everyone your ways so that we too can be joyless assholes.