The trap also comes with a small harmonica, ball and chain shackle, and a black and white striped jump suit.

*self defense* is killing people. One of the things with guns is not to draw them if you don’t fully intent to kill your target. There is no Mexican standoff like you see in movies. If you draw your gun, you damn better need to. This is how you prevent lawsuits. Don’t shoot to incapacitate or intimidate, shoot to kill…

I was looking at various stocks yesterday and was shocked where go pro sat. Do people not but new go pros because the market is saturated? I have a go pro 3+ silver and look at the hero 4 and scoff at the price. My go pro has features that still compete with other cameras, why would I upgrade?

Why would it be pointed in your direction?

Nearly everything about the regulation of guns are exaggerated and deliberately misconstrued to convince people not educated otherwise that control is the solution. You want to lower the gun related crime? Advance the study of mental health and psychology. Blame the shooter, not the gun. Don’t label the whole…

Yea I don’t want to deviate too much from the topic at hand here. The title of the article refers to the gun itself literally, whether or not something else is implied.

I thought it was a little rude to say the least. As much as I disagree with anyone, I live in America, and as such we should protect freedom of speech, and not wish death upon those who disagree.

Bingo. Any fear of an inanimate object is irrational. It, by itself, can cause no one harm.

I try not to imply. It only voids an argument of clarity.

Interesting, in each one of those instances, it was a person who shot the gun.

Well, if we’re being super pedantic, I wouldn’t leave it on my counter. It has the potential to be knocked off and broken. But in the hands of no one, that vial has the ability to do nothing.

I’ll agree with this.

That guy did not reference any of the influences that build or use nuclear weapons. The question was about the bomb.

No. I just thought the first sentence deserved it’s own post. People can reflect their opinions by liking the posts individually.

So it’s the potential that’s scary, not the gun itself.

If no one is around to detonate them, they’re more or less a very expensive paper weight.

Because people are generally scared of things they don’t understand. I’m also scared of people who use them with ill-intent. The fear has nothing to do with the gun itself.

I statistically have a higher chance of dying in a car crash.

I agree. However the article states that all of the stressed parts were store bought.

This is also true. But unless that person ended up shooting that innocent camera, it breaks one of the cardinal rules of gun ownership.