Right. Honestly, the category is huge here. As soon as "State Capitals" pops up on that board, you have to assume A and B's first thought is: "Shit, I have to bet it all."

To play devil's advocate, wagering $5,999 would let her keep the buck if things played out as expected (and the others both answered wrong), while still potentially putting her in the lead if for some dumb reason the other two wagered only a partial amount and missed. But betting the whole $6,000 was just a colossally…

Good point, zebbart. In fact, there's pretty much no difference in wagering zero or wagering one dollar less than her total, unless you consider her take-home cash if she wins the match or (for some ungodly reason) think the other two contestants have no sound strategy going into their Final Jeopardy wagering. So I…

Here's the thing: Randi REALLY should have left herself a buck and won this game. "U.S. Capitals" is a category every Jeopardy contestant studies before going on the show. Confidence had to be high, and with the top two contestants tied, it's easy for everyone to assume they both had to wager it all in an attempt to…

Forget Sam Elliot. Wynn Duffy's mustache is back!

Co-signed.