Stephen Hamel, who came up with the ‘story’ for Replicas, was an uncredited executive producer on the first John Wick, so I guess Reeves did a friend a favor - which might also explain his appearance in Siberia earlier last year, an equally awful movie coming from Hamel’s malfunctioning noggin. And there’s apparently…

As a Belgian-Belgian, I concur.

Hey, Nostradamus!

I agree. Sightseers is probably my favourite, with A Field in England as a close second, and I’ve seen all of Wheatley’s movies. High-Rise is also okay, but that’s mostly because I’m an avid Ballard fan; I’m pretty sure the movie won’t work for a casual viewer who’s not acquainted with the source material. Free Fire…

If anybody should sue the makers of this film, it’s Peter Jackson and Dan Milano, since this is just a terribly blatant ripoff of both Meet the Feebles and Greg the Bunny.

As a European film fanatic, I’m surprised that this is the first time I’ve ever noticed the term ‘Europudding’ - a wonderful word that’s apparently been around since the eighties. And that, Ignatiy, is one of the reasons why I love your reviews. Thanks!

Yeah, I watched it with the captions on, and it is, indeed, ‘forum’ - although admittedly, ‘foreign’ would’ve worked nicely, too.

The novel ‘Damage’ was based on was written by a woman, and it’s a very accurate adaptation, so what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

Clicking on ths article was a bad idea, apparently; six months after the messy breakup, I’m clearly nowhere near over her. Some great choices here, though.

Okay, I’ve bitten my tongue for far too long now, and after four episodes I can honestly say: I don’t think Cress Williams is a particularly versatile actor. Switching from a dramatic parenting scene via a frenetic action sequence to a confrontational staredown with random goons, his facial expression does not change…

Yeah, kids nowadays are all about nuking the fridge and chewing the soap.

Do you honestly think those writings would ever have gotten past a corporate proofreader, if it weren’t for some risk-taking magazine editor to introduce their names to a wider audience? Back in the day, Playboy had tremendously great articles, and you should at least be grateful that they had a clear eye for…

Ignatiy, just a question: was this review badly written on purpose? If so: nice infinite mirror. If not: grammar nazis are out of style these days - which irks me somewhat.

Regarding this episode, I’ve got just one four-letter word reply:

What, they really have to pinch pennies at this point?

This entire episode was another disappointing mess, but the Coraline bit really ticked me off. Why in God’s name did they choose to CGI it instead of doing it in stop-motion? Furthermore, the effects seemed lazier than Homer³, which, admittedly, is a classic Treehouse segment - from 22 YEARS AGO.

No, it isn’t.

Yes. Also, thanks for that link to an incredibly loud autoplay video to get to the actual photo. Nice going.

I made a new account, and tried to link it to my old one with the Kinja thingy, and the page kept crashing. Somehow I did get my old moniker and pic back, but none of the old comments. No idea what happened there, really.

The new layout looks awful, and removed any remnant of practical use this website had left. Goodbye.