rayclark7
Rayshmayshmay
rayclark7

Imagine being such a corporate cheerleader that you demonize consumers from organizing and giving feedback. Maybe instead of being a bootlicking megacorp apologist, you could find your moral center and realize that these companies don’t want complaints and that most of this narrative is designed to serve them. 

You mean you want gamers who pay $60 of their hard-earned cash for a broken AAA title to be nice and friendly with the fucks who ripped them off?

I agree! It really seems like the bulk of the antipathy towards the game stems from people realizing their friends aren’t as funny as they thought (e.g. the people who always just pick the grossest card, regardless of context -- you can definitely guess that, but it isn’t fun, it’s just boring). If you play with kind,

It was, but once you get all the cards a few times it gets old. But that’s not their fault and they have added millions of expansions 

Whilst I totally tired of the game after a while (not a slight on it, just don’t like doing the same thing much too often) I feel like this a bit misses the point (or missed the point of what was fun for me).

Just a gentle reminder to commenters that Cards Against Humanity is an extremely progressive, charitable company that supports lots of awesome causes and has been making a very active, vocal effort to encourage humor that “punches up, not down.” (And IMO, the game itself is very fun as long as you play with the right

Speaking of stupid comments thanks TPC. 

.

I don’t know he looks like the haunting type.

As someone that lives in San Francisco, I’d like to see a lot fewer cars so those of us who ride bikes and scooters because there is no where to park don’t need to worry about being killed by a bad driver in a Patagonia vest all the time.

Damn man, a hole in the elbow for complaining about lag? The universe is really dialing up the karmatic justice these days.

Yeah, this is just a garbage article all around.

Hey Justin, no amount of excuses you make will make it seem normal to not use a screen protector. That’s been the normal since the beginning of time.

Actually, it’s a perfect analogy. In both standard use cases, the product will incur normal wear and tear. That’s the point being made. A phone will get some scratches if it encounters hard/sharp objects in your pocket/bag/whatever. A car will get some scratches from driving down the highway, or more likely, less kept

Except Apple specifically changed the makeup of the glass to make it softer, and less likely to crack. However, when it’s softer that means that it’s more likely to scratch.

lol equity on a mobile device. phones are not investments.

yeah, he definitely got ripped on that part. $9 on amazon for a 2 pack.

if you can afford it, why not? don’t judge someone’s purchase because they’re complaining that the expensive phone they were lead to believe is going to be better than anything else before it got scratches on the screen. however, you can judge the fact that he didn’t take any precautions to protect his expensive

I agree completely. If you’re crazy enough not to use a screen protector, whatever happens happens. It’s 2019, keep up! Doesn’t matter what they do to make it better or how much more it costs, it’s always going to possible to scratch it... Period!

This was my thought exactly. My X has been caseless and screen protectorless since day one.