Ignore him. Very little of anything he's said is worth a reply.
Ignore him. Very little of anything he's said is worth a reply.
Really? It is "embarrassingly awful"? I think a game like Aliens Colonial Marines would be embarrassingly awful, Smash Bros is far from that. Maybe you don't like the game for a variety of reasons, but that doesn't make a game awful. I dislike Halo games, I don't go around saying it is awful. Stop with the over…
Its always a much better idea to be a skeptic, or at best cautiously optomistic. If you have high hopes for something and they meet them, you are satisfied. If you are skeptical, you get blown away which feels a lot nicer lol.
"I'm Pretty Sure Sunset Overdrive is Ratchet & Clank Reskinned"
Nintendo made Fire Emblem 4. A game about incest,brain washing and death.
Actually Nintendo has a number of titles going all the way back to the NES that aren't family-friendly. Sweet Home (the game that inspired Resident Evil) and Megami Tensei (the precursor to the Shin Megami Tensei series) both came out on the Famicom, and Clock Tower was originally a title for the Super Famicom.
In a way I'm glad Spore was awful because that was a turning point in my life. I was only VIDJA GAEMZ with zero interest in friends and when all the hype came crashing down, I felt empty and realized that there was more to life than overhyped video games you'll get bored off in a few months.
It's highly unlikely that the Wii U version was the most advanced in development, because Devil's Third was first announced in 2010... more than 2 years before the Wii U's launch.
Nintendo PR bullshit? So a developer can't say anything good about Nintendo and what they allowed them to do...
Only if a term of the buyout was Shinji Mikami getting to take what he used in Vanquish and apply it to a remade and massively improved version of Project Number 03, and then get the main character in as Smash DLC.
Well, that being the possible case and logic: expect Nintendo to buy out Capcom.
Nintendo is not failing, you are a troll, nice try though.
I find it odd that when an exclusive releases for ps4/xbox one everyone goes "yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy" and release it just for the wii u and people say "How dare you make me buy one" I personally love my ps4 and wii u for what they each offer. If nintendo are going to keep pushing developers to do as they want then I'm all…
I really only hear great input from developers working with Nintendo. The exception being the larger publishers who have always complained that Nintendo is willing to put more time into their products than said publisher will themselves.
I certainly wouldn't mind Nintendo stepping in when studios/series/IPs get canned by others. They'd probably salvage what they can and then people freak out on why it's a Nintendo exclusive - See Bayonetta 2.
It's starting to be a trend, actually. Nintendo is seemingly trying to break the "looks like it's for Nintendo" or "must be for Nintendo" notions when people see a certain type of game.
I am super looking forward to this and the online multiplayer looks so crazy insane. I hope it delivers and it doesn't get left on the shelves because of the other many great tiles coming this year for Wii U.
Devil's Third was originally being published by THQ until they had issues and put it on hold. Itagaki got the rights back, and then Nintendo stepped in to help.
I don't care how it'll look like in the end, I want to "play" this game.
I'm rather looking forwards to this game. The multiplayer looks nuts, the single player looks bombastic in tone and a supportive Nintendo + Itagaki team up makes me tingle in my kidneys. I felt the same way when watching Bayonetta 1/2 at Treehouse Live, when they were talking about how supportive Nintendo were for…