Have an original thought, you can't.

Well, this Jet was specifically designed to NOT be like previous jets. Oops!

You are really good at generalizing.

Explain why it makes sense.

not yet

Do you have a better way to cool the jet? No? Do you just throw out blanket statements and then hope they get supported? Yes.

Well, it is possible Lockheed is getting billed for this.

take your own advice and stop thinking you have the moral authority; you do not. Using tired old phrases like "youtube would be a good home for you" and "move on kiddo" make you sound like a tired, old, beaten down, and lazy fellow. relax, champ (see what I did there, it's funny). i do not troll; but you are trying…

I see you can't use your own words. Cool.

hahhahaha cruel, funny, but fair.

What is the point? That you made a shitty analogy and can't explain it?

what are you in charge of?

No it does not.

Apple sucks; but this fighter jet has nothing to do with a consumer product launch. Source: common sense and having a brain, Jimz.

because it is not a hunk of junk; stop believing hype nonsense

hehe

this analogy is stupid and wrong because the temperature of fuel in your gas tank is not a critical part of the heat sink and radar avoidance ability of your car. try again mister nonsense.

well, why aren't you billing them?

new technology has bugs; the plane is operating as designed. The fuel is a heat sink, this is described in the article.

that makes no sense.