I feel like 120 k is far too ambitious for this.

esports just aren't that big. especially when you compare it with how much revenue these companies bring in. I'm always shocked Starcraft 2 is the biggest game in the medium though.

They aren't, they are trolling Riot games.

all Mobas are pretty boring to watch, I have no idea how they are the most popular esports to watch.

Exclusive to the Ouya? Probably not so much, I'm sure devs want to make money and exclusivity won't do it unless Ouya sends them a fat pile of money.

Well, I guess now you have 13.37 to spend on apps for your screenless cellphone.

don't validly criticize anyone or they might take their ball and go home.

I mean honestly, any Mangaka that strikes it big with one of their titles essentially milks it for all its work, continuing it on long past the time where it would have been reasonable or realistic to stop. ESPECIALLY in the last 15-20 years. Dragon Ball ended with 42 Volumes (that's Dragon Ball - Dragon Ball Z) and…

Manga is considered a form of art in Japan by the same kinds of people who consider comic art to be art in the west.

Sadly that's not the real RX, but it kinda shows what I'm talking about. Juggles for days.

The level of exaggeration depends on the game. Some games the tier lists are closer and others farther away. KOF's tier list is so up in the damn air because people end up successfully fielding characters everyone else thought were junk.

The thing about MTG and Netdecking is that while it can win you some local stuff, it won't really do you too much good so long as the format keeps shifting, because good players will be working on the NEXT deck rather than playing the same exact thing over and over.

Matchups factor into tier lists. Hakan is still not that great (not that he's the worst) because against most characters he's really not that great. You got to see someone do very well through counter picking, which is cool in and of itself but doesn't make Hakan great or Tier lists invalid.

How does that even make sense? If a game is good, there tends to be very little flaws or completely unintended combos. So Among those games that are good, why would you have a problem with someone using the dominant strategy? It's like saying "I Don't like baseball because they spend all their time getting good…

Do you feel that way about all esports or just fighting games? because I mean unless you play top level Starcraft 2, you probably would have to spend a lot of time to learn the skills required to do so. Any game played at the top level requires a large investment of time.

Shouldn't the best Evo moves be from the actual games played? KOF Finals were hype beyond belief.

There are more efficient and effective ways to spend meter and bar. That having been said, given 5 Meters and Full HD 80%+ damage isn't unreasonable.

why? Street Fighter 3 had as many if not more "juggle" opportunities, it was completely loaded with them. Street Fighter 3 just ended up being more unbalanced than most other SF games, and had a huge execution barrier, ensuring only a few highly elite players could perform well in it.

I don't disagree with you. But thinking about it a bit, most video game characters in "modern" games, are criminals or ne'er do wells of some kind.