Matchups factor into tier lists. Hakan is still not that great (not that he's the worst) because against most characters he's really not that great. You got to see someone do very well through counter picking, which is cool in and of itself but doesn't make Hakan great or Tier lists invalid.

How does that even make sense? If a game is good, there tends to be very little flaws or completely unintended combos. So Among those games that are good, why would you have a problem with someone using the dominant strategy? It's like saying "I Don't like baseball because they spend all their time getting good…

Do you feel that way about all esports or just fighting games? because I mean unless you play top level Starcraft 2, you probably would have to spend a lot of time to learn the skills required to do so. Any game played at the top level requires a large investment of time.

Shouldn't the best Evo moves be from the actual games played? KOF Finals were hype beyond belief.

There are more efficient and effective ways to spend meter and bar. That having been said, given 5 Meters and Full HD 80%+ damage isn't unreasonable.

why? Street Fighter 3 had as many if not more "juggle" opportunities, it was completely loaded with them. Street Fighter 3 just ended up being more unbalanced than most other SF games, and had a huge execution barrier, ensuring only a few highly elite players could perform well in it.

I don't disagree with you. But thinking about it a bit, most video game characters in "modern" games, are criminals or ne'er do wells of some kind.

Apple likes gay money but they don't particularly like gay people.

Buying used at gamestop facilitates demand that makes them buy more new copies from the manufacturer. the easiest way to kill the beast would be to not buy a copy of the game at all.

you realize you have to actually not buy the game in order for them to not get any money right?

Booker is strangled in the pool while he is being baptized "both sinner and saint" as Comstock says in one of the recordings. the idea is that you negate the possibility that Booker will become Comstock, but you DO negate the birth of Ana because you kill the Booker possibility as well.

It's kind of insulting when people make the implication that if you didn't like the ending, you didn't "Get" the ending. I got the ending, I just wasn't really satisfied with the internal consistency of the story in regards TO the ending.