randomobserver2011--disqus
random_observer_2011
randomobserver2011--disqus

I'm not comparing Hamill to the POTUS, if that's the Joe you mean. He's an actor riffing on a current topic in a way that fits his opinion. He's allowed. And I laughed. I'm comparing two sets of issues or two accusations. Hamill himself doesn't embody that.
I'm not actually sure that is the most serious accusation

No, that the criticism of Trump based on lack of evidence is a weak criticism in light of how much and how long we have been experiencing this Russia scare with no evidence being made public and no real effort being made to define terms. Similarly, criticism of Trump based on implausibility is a weak criticism when

We haven't had a hint of evidence to back up the two months of hysteria about the Russians that has consumed American life, either. I'm open to what might be in intelligence from wiretaps or otherwise, sure. But…
So far, it's all that first Flynn and now Sessions met with the ambassador. The Russians are hardcore and

Of course we're also in the middle of a bizarre campaign of Russohysteria by people whose forebears (or in some cases the same people) didn't care about or believe in Russian espionage or propaganda operations for decades and continued to deny their existence well after Soviet records demonstrated their truth. And

Trump's mode of delivery never helps, but I take it nobody notices that the idea of official wiretapping is only crazy if it's Trump claiming to have been the victim.
Were it anybody else, it would have gotten a hearing. If the accusation were someone else against Trump, it would also have gotten a hearing.
Admittedly,