I know I am clearly not on topic, but at a really quick, first glance I thought this would be an article about roller derby women & I got excited.
I know I am clearly not on topic, but at a really quick, first glance I thought this would be an article about roller derby women & I got excited.
Agree with Dana. Both the Yukon and the Sienna look significantly better than this. Shoot, the unholy love spawn of a Yukon and a sienna would probably still look better than this...
I guarantee you that Whole Foods paid Tesla handsomely for that product placement.
It’s basically a minivan with doors that go up instead of slide.
Better looking than a Yukon? Not in my opinion. This car is ugly. I love the Model S but this looks too egg-shaped and bubbly. Yuck.
“Tesla thinks the the car will still be escapable.”
Remember what Top Gear said about gullwing doors disqualifying you socially? If you bring your kids to school with those doors on your car, they will get beat the fuck up by everybody including the teachers as soon as you are around the corner.
Who else could afford this vehicle other than some Whole Foods shoppers?
So it has cool doors in the back, but toyota camry doors in the front? That’s not right.
I would never park a $130000+ car that close to any car...
Wow. You’re totally right. So does that mean that if your first Model X ran out of juice you couldn’t even use your back-up Model X to tow it to a Supercharger station?
Curb weight is about 5,400 pounds.
I was excited about this car, until the very last paragraph. Fuck me, you can get an S63 AMG for that cash. And I seriously doubt it has the same comfort as you get in an S class.
All that power to back up that massive kardashian sized rear-end.
Cool concept car, because a $140,000 minivan/CUV is far from a production vehicle.
Whatever the opposite of a butterface is, thas what this car is. Ducking dumptruck ass in the back, and not in a good way.