That’s exactly what I read as well... The first judge got it wrong. She failed to realize the murder had nothing to do with Reeva per say. The fact that he started shooting, was in reckless disregard for whoever was in the toilet room, sense he did not or could show imminent danger for his life, with no other recourse…

It happens all the time in the U.S. in one form or another. Sometimes all to late, for the wrongly convicted, who is facing death or has of the crime

Ditto.... Nicely said. I read another article, where the author explained dolus eventualis, but first he covered “Dumbass Eventualis”. Oscar P. was pretty much a dumbass and a hot head, in possesion of a deadly weapon. He knew what was going to happen, once he decided to discharged his weapon. And, the rest of us know…

Ditto.... Nicely said. I read another article, where the author explained dolus eventualis, but first he covered “Dumbass Eventualis”. Oscar P. was pretty much a dumbass and a hot head, in possesion of a deadly weapon. He knew what was going to happen, once he decided to discharged his weapon. And, the rest of us know…

According to South African law, Oscar P. did not established that he was in imminent danger — he never was, in fact — and should have forseen what would happen. O.P. had the gun. He was in control all along. We can’t never know if he intended to murder his girl. But like the high court said, no matter who was behind…

Ditto.... Nicely said. I read another article, where the author explained dolus eventualis, but first he covered “Dumbass Eventualis”. Oscar P. was pretty much a dumbass and a hot head, in possesion of a deadly weapon. He knew what was going to happen, once he decided to discharged his weapon. And, the rest of us know…