I appreciate the attempts to make an apology. However i noticed that you completely glossed over the harassment that that pro-gamergate people received. You also glossed over the fact that the person that was "Bullied" out of writing for video games "Bullied" people behind the "Gamers are trash" banner which lead to…

Why are you surprised about this? This is the same news site that would run a story on the over sexualization of minors if the 3DS was not region locked.

Dear Kotaku,

But that is what i mean though. Even in places where it does not apply they post this kind of information. Its because they know that it would be controversial.

Its unavoidable because it gets clicks and people make money from this narrative.

I hope you truly believe that. And i hope that what you are hoping for, and those two articles are hoping for never happens. Because you know exactly what you mean when you say, "Gamer identity is dying". However to the hundreds of thousands of people that said that gaming cause violence, this will be fuel for their…

(Before you read, keep in mind i am a Black, Homosexual Male)

What the fuck does peace have to do with privilege?

Shattered Memories has as much in common with Silent Hill 1 - 4 as Final Fantasy <insert x> has in common with <insert any other final fantasy instead of x>.

"Revengance" is an actual word. It is the concept, or the Idea of taking revenge. It fell out of use because most people considered the term to be redundant specifically because it was one of the few places where the action was different from the idea or concept of the action and the fact that vengeance is not quite…

I have that exact same fear @__@.

Instead of attempting to make diablo better than the diablo thing why didn't this person just name it something else?

Maybe its because she's wrong and her writing is stupid and actually what is she doing on kotaku? she reminds me of the black person that shows up on fox news to say black people are lazy.

I see your 10/10/9/10 review of her message.

1 - 8% of accusations taken to trial are proven false.

So your entire point is that none of them have any proof, therefore the gut must start a conversation about consent because fucking obviously right? He was accused so he needs to start a conversation on consent because when someone is accused of murder, the person who is accused is required to start a conversation on…

Its because the vast majority of accusations of rape never make it to court. If Person A falsely accused person B of Rape, then person A drops all charges and recants their statement, then that does not count towards the false rape statistic.

No.

This very article is why i cannot take Feminism serious. This is also why i cannot take the whole "Rape culture" bullshit seriously.