When men write about their lives and romances it’s artistic and profound. When women write about their lives and romances it’s petty, narcissistic and shallow.

I am so tired of this idea that being a misunderstood tortured male artist is somehow a more valid form of the expression, and the only role there is for women is the one that either destroys him or saves him.

lol. I love it when people make it so easy to see what their problem really is. The other day I was listening to a podcast in which a white woman said “Hamilton” is shit and used Eminem as her example for what a technically proficient rapper should sound like. Like maybe make your bias a little less obvious, guys.

Girl, Yes. And the abortion issue is the same for them too. So much concern for potential babies, but once they’re actually babies, they get no support.

Always been that way. When victims aren’t pretty upper middle class white people no one cares.

Just to say, this got virtually NO local coverage in the news beyond the first few weeks after they’d identified him and started showing the photographs drawn from his nightmare-ish collection of rape and murder memorabilia. Little about jury selection, no daily reports or blow-by-blows during the trial, barely a…

I’m just reminded of all the conservatives who are acting like these transphobic bathroom laws are rooted in a desire to protect women and girls from being raped. Then I think about Brock Turner and Owen Labrie and Lonnie Franklin, and countless others who either get reduced sentences or are not caught for years. And…

And in this case, we get the news of it at all. Albeit late. How many POC have been murdered and no one ever heard about it? There are victims and then there are victims the system cares about.

Of course because they know the police aren’t gong to waste money searching for these women when there are Ivy League rapists to protect.

And my only thought: How many times has his father forced his “20 minutes of action” on some victim?

The only reason he even got 25 years is because he was an immigrant as well.

That was their “heyday,” Reagan in office, white people in most roles and less black people around, even less than the ‘70s! They don’t want anything to encroach on those days—even though they were kind of sucky.

I honestly and seriously can’t tell if she’s merely a female corollary of a Chris Tucker or Tracy Morgan, in terms of style and presentation of personality and blackness as an individual representation of slapstick and silliness.

Funny how as much as the filmmakers insists this new GB should be taken on its own merits apart from the original, it seems to still relegate the black character to “overglorified sidekick” status. And before you say, “Winston was supposed to represent the audience”, I call bullshit on that for the simple fact that…

“All-male movie” - isn’t that “most movies”?

I think Leslie knows what time it is (she's a dark-skinned black woman in America so I'm sure she does) and she probably didn't need the heat of having her white co-stars, crew and production giving her the side-eye and it being an impendent to her future employment in Hollyweird. Hollywood has always, like most…

False. Hollywood reboots movies that absolutely do not need them all the time (and most of the time the trailers for those projects look like shit too). I can’t think of a single reboot that has attracted anywhere NEAR the level of vitriol as the Ghostbusters reboot. There’s almost nothing different from Ghostbusters…

Well, shit, if those people tell you they don’t care they are women, well, it must be true. Anyone truly sexist would surely come right out and say so when confronted!

Funny, I read the youtube comments and it’s “OMG SJW feminazi’s ruin everything!”

playing an MTA worker amid three brainy white scientists