I just imagine a recruiting campaign with the Horde and Alliance trying to get this guy to join them with free gifts.
I just imagine a recruiting campaign with the Horde and Alliance trying to get this guy to join them with free gifts.
If he had fun doing it (and reveling in the 15 seconds of fame afterwards) then it's money well spent.
Good for him. Not everyone can manage grinding that dull and repetitive. But to me, it still seems like waste of money considering the subscription fees. I mean surely the person in question could come up with something better to do as this feat basically accomplishes nothing? Unless Activision-Blizzard decides to do…
Pedantry: It *is* censorship, but it's not a first amendment issue.
Maybe I'm missing something here. Why is the argument flawed? Why is it okay one way and not the other? Serious question. The way I see it, either way is just winnowing down to a single (or maybe a couple) attributes, simply based on gender and attire.
Are you assuming that all men want to look like a piece of shit muscular meat head? That's not my fantasy.
PS4 owners should have bought a PC if resolution was their biggest concern. Like lol wut? I'm not saying consoles are bad but if presentation is your setting point then yeah you need a PC - this is known.
Above: one particularly-interesting section of a recent Nielsen survey that probes console owners about the factors…
These are fair requests if it was a call for more games to feature these ideas. Its unfair to demand all games to adhere to this type of censorship. I mean the Japanese/Eastern game industry would crumble. (joke.)
All of these things are fair and rational requests to make. Can't see any reason anyone would have a problem with any of them.
Shorter version, if you just want the list of the list of what she says are "Eight things developers can do to make games less shitty for women", paraphrased from my notes... not that a lot of this pertain to action games and probably make more sense if you're thinking about first and third-person shooters, the Arkham…
The costume looks awesome. It's actually pretty toned down for a hentai artist. I still wouldn't buy it though, because I buy games, not bonus content.
I liked Revelations 1 a lot. It was a return to form for what made the series good...
No problem, buddy. Thanks for reading. Hope to win you over in time.
This looks a lot more like RE4 than RE6. That's something, at least.
This won't work simply because there are 10 players in every match, and as a result if even 1 out of every 10 players was to use this option, pro streaming would cease to exist entirely. It would tank the ENTIRE streaming business.
What happens when a top player wants to stream his games and gets into a match where one…
So if you want to spectate a friend's game, but he gets matched with one player out of the ten in that game with private option marked.. then what?
While a good idea on paper, this gets a lot more complicated in a game like LoL where there are 10 different players who could all have those settings switched on/off, and any of whom could want to stream or upload the video to YouTube
The epidemic of people assuming the internet's voice is the majority is absurd. The internet is extremely vocal, but they are definitely the minority, on all subjects. The vast majority, on all subjects, keep to their fucking selves or discuss in person with people they actually know rather than bitch online to…
I'd love to know what supporters it would drive away since the very first episode had Dany getting sold to some guy and then raped WHICH WAS WAY MORE FUCKING GRAPHIC THAN THIS. This article is fucking stupid.