i think the article is asking us to think about why we are okay breeding certain animals for food. if we bred lions or bears or horses for animals, would it make it okay?

i love dog companionship. but im not sure they’re wrong.

yes technically. but you should look it up. they have a reasoning behind it.

i have to say i dont think it was that hard to understand, if you get the context and reference. twitter is not where people go to write in perfect english—frankly neither is the jezebel comments section.

its been explained in the comments a few times.

see comment above yours

it’s twitter, it’s not gonna be perfect. it’s mostly fine except for the “immeasurably” spelling. the rest makes sense. using “about” as in “parading about”. as in, Tay takes Katy down all the time, and goes around arguing we shouldnt take other women down when it suites her.

you can identify as a person of color and not identify with all the same oppression. there. mind made up.

I saw it as a teen and it was good. I don’t really see it all that similar to Spring Breakers. Kids was gritty and felt more raw, like you were watching these things unfold as they would possibly happen in real life, whereas Spring Breakers is already famous actors and felt very hollywood and the plot line just felt…

i think your overall point still stands, but i believe the film is not a biopic. HuffPo (for what it’s worth) issued a correction: “A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that “Joy” is a biopic about Joy Mangano. Though inspired in part by her story, the title character is an amalgamation of several…

making a word that feels more inclusive isn’t the simple solution. instead, making feminism respond to the criticisms, will lead to progress, not just saying if we use the word “humanist” then everyone wins. the reason POC are often frustrated by feminism isn’t the word, in fact its that its too vague and doesn’t…

Feminism and humanism aren’t really correlated in that way, even though people use it like that (usually incorrectly). and feminism has a place separate from what *i think* your intended use of humanist is because it is not just “pro woman” but recognizing that structures have been oppressive and therefore putting…

All the same, we can’t know from these heavily edited snippets precisely what Lee thinks of all this, and, of course, it’s none of our business.”. So, then what is the point of this article if you really believe it’s none of our business?

I wonder if that’s part of the Chuck D is making? that other men have flown under the radar and haven’t been put in the spotlight the way Cosby has?

many very young children are aware of their gender identity and many in elementary school are already changing pronouns. to see a show and say “ooo i want that”, even if you dont fully understand it, makes total sense to me

gawd that’s annoying. Like, you can’t possibly imagine stress if you haven’t planned a wedding

I’m not sure what SCOTUS has to do with an opinion on etiquette and thoughts on what a good approach is. Obviously you have the RIGHT to do whatever you want. I’m simply sharing that i don’t think your right to do something is necessarily the best approach. It’s like saying you have the right to serve only meat at…

Marriages are about the Bride and Groom. But when you choose to have a full on wedding, it does also become about the people you are inviting. isn’t that the point of not just going to city hall? to share the experience with others? isn’t the point of hosting a party to make others have a good time too? you don’t…

I get that planning a wedding is stressful. but it’s not stressful like, “I just got fired” or “I’m starting a new job” or “my mother is very sick” or “I’m trying to make ends meet” or “I’m curing cancer”. At some point i just tune out all the self pity of planning a wedding. It’s an optional thing you are choosing to…

even if it’s a lot of extra work...it’s your job, so more work is okay