Isn’t it strange that you have no point to make, but are simply restating things that I say?

Some number of them almost certainly have CTE to some extent. And I’m not excusing anything or anyone; on the other hand, I’m incriminating an entire sport and its mentality.

I completely agree. Execution should only be for the absolutely unrepentant, when the benefit to the society-at-large is a definite benefit. Rehabilitation is the best route, because it allows for the possibility for forgiveness and change, and that is part of the path of love.

It’s called “paying attention” for a reason. That’s how and why the Stones are still rocking all these years later. And that’s also why musicians often drink and sex and drug to excess after their shows: they’re amped up with energy.

That’s very, very good. Well done, indeed.

No, murder is the killing of an innocent person. A murderer is not innocent thus taking their life is not murder. It’s justice for the society.

Fed has taken on-court conservation of energy to the level of complete nonchalance. And, seriously, he barely sweats.

Grown ups make points. And read about the Nazis, stupid. What are you gonna do, ask `em nicely?

Have fun down their with your zero-point horseshit.

All that matter is our true intentions and methods of action. If truly just and without selfish desire for profit, then we will do our best to exercise care and minimize collateral damage.

To deny them due process and a fair trial would be to oppress an innocent.

Freedom is the law of the human universe. To oppress someone is strictly forbidden, oppression being the unjust treatment of the innocent.

Society must not endure the unrepentant murderers, nor must it feed and house them until they die of natural causes. Someone such as Assad deserves the death penalty. It is that simple.

I’m talking about hurting innocents ON PURPOSE. That’s oppression.

Thanks for proving my point about yourself.

First, nothing about killing Assad is violent. It is justice. For you to not understand that means you are a troll.

My ideals give me away, but they give me strength. And love and wisdom give me power. And, apparently, my perspective is unique.

And you are still without an actual point, just ad hominems and vague references to history.

So, you agree with my definition of oppressor and innocent.

An innocent is never harming someone or depriving someone of their freedom.