I was hoping someone picked up on that. I mean, it’s pretty obvious what Gravik is up to: they are using the DNA to make super-skrulls.

Linda doesn’t like Marvel so is only half paying attention to what is going on.

I think the review explains it well enough. But even if what you aid was true, a movie can still “do the opposite” and still not be good.

I don’t think it IS the easy access that makes TCM valuable in a lot of people’s eyes (myself included.) I mean, it’s part of it. But the curation is a bigger part of it, as is the original intros/outros and context the channel uses to put the films into that separates it from, say, just a streaming service with a big…

A dirty bomb is a nuisance weapon - the radiological activity almost certainly is not hot enough to kill you from a 15 minute exposure, but it is going to tie up a massive amount of resources in decontamination to make the target site suitable for long-term occupancy, and in treating exposed civilians.

Those things are not mutually exclusive. Contrary to some trending opinions, it's not necessary to tear down something just because it's old in order to support something new. 

One of the files G’iah pulls up, in addition to Groot and the others, was Extremis. And the physical effects of the dose that Sonya injects into the guy during the interrogation seemed very much like that. So if the Skrulls are collecting information on something that she’s actually using, what does that say about…

“Fine. You can have your...‘art.’”

I like Fury, but if he were to get knocked unconscious next episode and not wake up until everything is over in the finale, I’d be absolutely tickled to watch this show led by Sonya, lunatic MI6 agent.

You’re Paul Thomas Anderson, and you’re the third-most exalted film director in the room.

That’s not entirely true either. The Batgirl write-off was specific to the Warner(HBO)/Discovery merger process, allowing a one-time “total loss” write off that required scrapping the film and salting the earth, never to be able to see the light of day.

If and when Paramount offloads Prodigy, they can take $(“value”) +…

There is also a brief shot of her before Fury is shoved into the van which was new footage.

Nick keeps his car in a Brixton lockup.

Was it confirmed as a dirty bomb though?

Did you even read the article linked in that first sentence?

The funny thing about people bringing up Tuvix and discussing “was Janeway a murderer” (or likewise her actions that stranded the ship in the pilot episode) is that it’s indicative of how good of a character and how good Voyager was (or, well, could be at times). Nobody would keep bringing up Tuvix if the moral was…

She is in the episode during the recapish thing at the beginning.  Even if it’s a replay of a scene from the previous episode, she still needs to be credited.  

You’re surprised that the world’s secretest secret agent doesn’t talk about family members or loved ones that could be exploited and used against him? The guy who told Captain America not to trust anybody, and who was betrayed by, like, the one guy he considered a close friend (Alexander Pierce)? That’s a shock to you?

“THIS DAMN SWAN WON’T SHUT UP!” 

Counterpoint: Fun Action for the Family can ALSO be great film-making! In fact, it should be! Look at Jurassic Park, Jaws, the 1st and 3rd Indiana Jones Movies, Wall-E, Mad Max: Fury Road, etc...