Thanks! Comments like this brighten my day!

Not a review. These are just my impression from the beta. I enjoyed myself overall and found myself playing a lot more than I expected. It might not please everyone but for what it is worth considering, I had a good time.

Look, I have bipolar disorder with major depression. It’s about communication. If you break plans because you can’t get out of bed, for example, have the decency to communicate that you have to break your plans. No ghosting. There’s a difference between being mentally ill and being a jerk. You can’t blame being a…

Dying takes too long. I’ve been doing this shit for decades.

It’s still going through the respective console stores, and if parents haven’t set up access restrictions then that’s on them.

Seriously, I would love to see a fully autonomous vehicle drive as well and as safely as I do. I’m comfortable saying it won’t happen even in 5 years.

You know why? I respect the multi-ton piece of machinery I’m operating as well as those outside of the vehicle. I only pick up my phone to maybe skip a song while the…

Damn...lol

Why in the hell is this an issue? If you would rather not be responsible for driving yourself, move to an area with a well-developed public transportation system and take the bus or the train. It is so damn stupid that being distracted by a mobile device or other activities in the car has become such an acceptable…

“If you know you can save at least one person, at least save that one.”

Yep, I was thinking something close to that. Philosophy people don’t like it when you deconstruct the scenerio and pick none of the above.

In the future world where driving your own car will be banned, only criminals will drive cars.

eh.. as i read the question it was pretty easy anyway... i mean depending on wich way the kids are crossing they’re going to end up running off a cliff or infront of the aproaching unavoidable truck.... so really..nothing you do could save the kids

Here’s how I look at it; these systems are and always will be fallible. Do you want a self driving car that might get spooked by a smooshed bug on a sensor and decide to swan-dive off a cliff? Should a pauper-shaped radar artifact be able to cause your car to force a head-on collision? We can’t confuse abstract ethics…

Yes, just like no one’s ever died in an unavoidable car accident. Because reality.

The answer is always to protect pedestrians. I have a few reasons for this:

This is a bullshit hypothetical false dichotomy.

But why swerve? Just brake for crying out loud. You wouldn’t, er, the car wouldn’t need to choose between frustrated murder or multiple murder. It’s more than capable of seeing what’s ahead. Just brake in time, don’t turn in anywhere.

Yes! Promoting alcoholism at the end of the ‘article’ right after firing off a class warefare bomb! Well done. Well written.