That’s some good whataboutism there!

As a pedant who lives in the area, it is Milwaukie, Oregon. Not Milwaukee.

Your number is off. Approximately 30% of the population rents, which makes charging difficult. Another chunk owns but doesn’t have off street parking. Another chuck requires longer driving distances, load carrying capacity, towing, etc. So your 80% number is too high by a minimum of 10% and possibly quite a bit more.

That is a good looking car.

So take the taxes we all pay (including renters) to incentivize property owners to install chargers, raising the value of their private property and giving them more reason to raise my rent.

The article says:

So you don’t like my smoking example because you don’t think smoking kills people. I disagree. Dead is dead, no matter how you get there.

Your original statement had nothing to do with public perception. You made a blanket statement that “You can’t kill your clients and have your business survive.” I offered up a specific and well-known example of a product whose users die as a result of its use but whose manufacturers are still in business. Your…

Quote “You can’t kill your clients and have your business survive.”

Hope you are wearing your Nomex suit.

You literally cannot get to my house from a market without driving on a 35mph highway. If these only go 25 max then they will be incredibly irritating. Perhaps they should be limited to only areas with 25 mph speed limits?

Quote:

Glass is a term that is quite misunderstood.

They could have released a statement that they support a single Federal standard but that they would prefer the levels that California has proposed. That would have sent the message that you are suggesting. They chose not to do that and simply joined the administration’s side in this battle. That says they want lower…

I actually called up the corporate office and told them I was reconsidering based on their stance. They didn’t seem surprised or concerned.

2nd Gear:

The Supra is available (elsewhere for now) with a smaller 2.0 liter turbo 4 cylinder engine that makes 254 hp. If Toyota puts 260 hp in the 86, then there is little justification to bring the entry Supra here. I suppose it comes down to what is more profitable.

Whiner whines about whining.

Not a union champion here, but I wonder how much benefit non-union shops get as a result of the UAW?

From what you linked: