I was on a site earlier today that said it was one of the best ads. In fact, there’s a link to it up there in the article.

How was it a terrible campaign when nobody on earth has been able to shut up about friggin M&Ms for the last 6 weeks? Seems to me like an extremely successful campaign.

Say it was “terrible” all day long, but conservatives were legit angry about it. They spent hours on prime time TV and in comments sections ranting and raving and showing their whole asses about it. If anything, it was vital market research that showed how easily manipulated Republicans really are.

That line is taken directly from Keaton’s first scene in the ‘89 Batman film. I’m hard pressed to think of a more fitting callback to his turn in the cowl...

The one thing about this movie that I ever cared about was getting to see Keaton as Batman one more time, and the trailer confirms I will so I am happy. To me, this is a short Batman 89 sequel with extended cameos by the Flash, the Moody Flash, Super-Not-Henry-Cavill-Girl, and Batfleck Returns.  Let’s see if any of…

I think it’s okay to bring up some concerns as recent titles have been struggling on the old hardware, but I agree there’s no way that’s the case here. Plus I think it’s been confirmed that Monolith is helping quite a bit with ToTK, and they’re wizards with the Switch hardware. No way this is a Scarlet / Violet…

I remember seeing that exact ad lol.  The cartridge system that they used made their games super expensive at the time.  I managed to convince my mom to get me an N64 but it was difficult trying to convince her to buy me a game that cost half the price of the system itself.

Not to mention the previous entry ran fine on the WiiU, aside from that one bug when you ragdoll a moblin.

And hopefully it runs okay on the aging Switch hardware.

It is also, sadly, the first Nintendo game to hit the $70 threshold.

The original Legend of Zelda MSRP’d at $49.99 back in 1986. That’s about $135 in 2022 dollars. 

Tiny? 40" is fat ass territory

I stand 5'10, and was 225 at my heaviest. Even then my waste was only 36 inches. 

Equating waistlines below 40' to “thin people” is the craziest title I’ve read today.

The majority of these comments that say to make the seats bigger seem to ignore the fact that children are a significant portion of the target audience for this ride. Making the seats larger to accommodate additional adults would then exclude children on the lower end of the safety limits of the ride. As a parent I’d…

Does it exclude half of the customers? The average 40 inch waistline refers to the adult population. One would have to think a high percentage of the people going on this ride are children. Making the seats bigger to accommodate larger adults would undoubtedly exclude some younger children who could ride it today.

Cracks me up some people want to paint a 40" waist as average. There’s a healthy middle ground between outright shaming people for being fat, and pretending being obese is healthy and desirable.

Agreed. About 36" waist currently as a guy and classify as overweight/borderline obese. Our increased sizes have become normalized to a terrifying degree.

I wonder if any of the 1000 people whose vision he helped restore feel the same way.

Maybe Beast is fine, he strikes me as benevolent but uninterested in deep examination