Being of a similar build to Donnie I would recommend against the M3.

These were pretty much the responses I was expecting to read. The most common answer is the one no one will bother to send in. Most people only vote R or D and can’t be bothered to look beyond what they always do.

ASTM d5598

My Arby’s story = Arby’s sucks + wet meat

I just completed the Title IX training at my university. I thought it was very well done but I am a guy and in my staff position I do not have regular contact with a large group of students. So, I may be way off base.

While it’s technically legal I know after a while I would be sick of seeing this thing parked next door every day.

The atmosphere was solid all night with zero problems that I saw.

What can I say - this is an issue of states rights directly from middle school govt class. Plus, what works emissions wise for the environment in OH is not the same as in CA. CA decided the smog was unacceptable and forced changes to improve their cities which is their right. If they were not such a big market no…

I understand your approach but the actual volume of tests is significantly higher than you are estimating.

I’m not saying you cannot create the perfect real-world test loop under a roof but all the conditions you are trying to control are already controlled in a lab. Plus you just created a facility with the capacity to test one vehicle every 30 minutes or so. Manufacturers have 100's of test cells. That’s a lot of…

There is already an in-use compliance program which pulls consumer vehicles for up to 5 years for verification at EPA. You get a replacement car and some nominal fee for each day your vehicle is gone. Vehicles have to be pulled from both hot and cold weather markets and at various mileage levels. All manufacturers…

EPA is the single standard. CARB is more stringent which is allowed. States have the right to go tougher with regulations but not easier.

Don’t forget about weather, pavement conditions, and tires which also have an effect.

Unfortunately the number of voting machines is typically based on the number of active voters in each area. The assignments are not based on population or registered voters but on past turnout. So when you get a larger than expected turnout once every 4 years it creates problems.

Why “punitive”? Audi intentionally cheated the test and defrauded consumers. ARB identified the issue and reported the results - this is exactly how the system is supposed to work.

CAFE is a fleet calculation based on the individual model results. The results used for CAFE are the emissions testing results submitted to EPA.

The vehicle has to pass the test in each available mode.

I also work at The large university in Ohio in a staff position. I agree with most of what you said. The salary is well well below industry average but they are trying. I’m concerned with the continued lack of funding for systems, equipment, labs. They do a great job on the big splashy items but then fail to…

Small cars are safe but it depends on the crash event. It’s all about the mass. Passenger ejection is the worst possible outcome however you will spend less time in the hospital - you’re dead more often is the downside.

Probably not much, could scratch the clear coat but that’s more likely to happen when the PB is wiped/cleaned off. Just a jerk move in general regardless of the reasons behind it.