You, my friend, have the patience of a saint. Well done.

Britons never, never, never shall be slaves...............A line from Rule Britannia.  I guess that they forgot about the Romans when they wrote it. 

Oh, the Trump Russia thing is because the first time I talked to him was in regards to the Mueller report, he called me a “fag” a bunch and kept dodging any question by sticking to that mantra.

I’ve encountered way too many similar types at this point to dismiss him as a bot. No, this is just a run-of-the-mill white nationalist Trumper. They argue exclusively in bad faith, can’t really reason their way through anything — hence the white nationalist beliefs — and react to the slightest adversity by whining,…

Many of these are simply discussing what it means to be white and acknowledging the advantages of said skin color going into the 21st century. That’s not a problem with being white (which no one can change) it’s addressing what the status of being white means and hoping to open dialogue and perspective. 

Ha, I quoted your own post from earlier in the thread. So now you’re lying by accusing others of lying.

Yes, I deny that “academia has a problem with white people.” Because that’s a stupid thing to believe, much less argue, no matter how much silly anecdotal evidence you scrape off your white nationalist forums. It’s sad that you think that article bolsters your case. And hilarious how badly you want to change the…

His true colors are coming out now. Someone doesn’t breathlessly defend white nationalists unless they sympathize with their cause. And he’s adding on homophobia to boot. 

Maybe! But academia =/= article on Salon. While certainly many writers there may have graduated from college, it’s dishonest of you to say that Salon represents Academia, otherwise I’d suggest that the far right articles you shared do the same thing, and you know that wouldn’t be honest.

So let’s stick to the fact…

No, you haven’t.

Oh look, more opinion pieces, yet zero academic studies.

Can you tell us what you think that article is about?

Not only would he not concede that generalization, he’s literally whining about whites being negatively stereotyped (using broad generalizations, no less) and blaming it for creating white nationalism. 

The defender of white nationalists decries overly broad generalizations used to criticize white people, then uses a broad generalization to criticize academia.

Landmine’s goal seems to be corralling people into his own arguments, which I’ve never seen him succeed at.

Sharing that article again are we?

Ever gonna read it?

Except “the left” isn’t shitting on young white men. That’s you repeating white nationalist rhetoric verbatim for ... reasons.

You posted that but did you actually read it? Do two opinion articles, one that was likely a reflection piece make for resting your case? How did you come across said articles? Do you often read the New York Times or did one of the white nationalists you talk with share it?

He’s both. But today he’s also a convenient punching bag to blow off some steam. 

I am listening to you. I am shooting down your shitty reasoning and lies.