What’s creepy about it is the implication that she can’t control these things not because the system is beyond her technical abilities while he’s building it, but she cannot control it because when you’re an engineer like zuckerberg (that’s another joke for another time), you can program your AI to ignore your wife,…

That just sounds creepy for Zuckerberg to have sole control of the AI in the home shared with his wife.

It needs to be run without involvement from the Clintons, sort of like how a president’s stocks and such are usually placed in a blind trust

I’m not crying, you’re crying! It’s just looks like I’m crying because of all the tears in your eyes, you crying crier. Also, rain.

Mayans must have miscalculated the end of the world by 4 years cause 2016 sucks.

I’m going to watch Blazing Saddles tonight, but that’s only because I don’t own a copy of Young Frankenstein.

Yeah! Screw all those poor people so rudely not dying of AIDS. Don’t they know that running an international charity is considered scandalous?!? If they wanted money for medicine, they should just ask their dad for a small loan of a million dollars or so.

The Laura Bush Foundation for America’s Libraries - founded 2002

Do you have any idea how HIV AIDS medications work? This is not something that can be stopped. 11 million lives for your optics.

When Clinton wins, I think it would be wholly appropriate to cease fundraising activities for the duration of her time as President or to turn the foundation over to some sort of external receiver. Obviously when she’s done in four or eight years, she and the family will want to return to doing the foundation work,…

I am not surprised that HamNo is here with an uninformed and uncritical hot take on the latest baseless scandal regarding the Clintons. But it’s more egregious than usual since most of the left punditry has concluded that the AP’s story was utterly bogus.

Don’t forget AIDS patients. They can go to hell. “Optics” matter more.

Then Clinton enemies would just find another thing to harass them over forever. Whitewater, Vince Foster, travel office, interns, emails, Benghazi!, Clinton Foundation...the list is endless.

Despite the hysterical propaganda, the Clinton Foundation raises billions for international development and has done some of the best work tackling HIV/AIDS in Africa. But no, by all means shutter it because Fox News tries to make anything tied to the Clintons look shady, and people can’t think critically

Counterpoint: No.

This article fails to mention that they’ve already stated that the foundation will scale back dramatically and will not accept foreign donations if (when) Hillary is elected.

So the Clinton foundation should shut down because it has the “appearance” of influence peddling BC we all know how people buy influence by giving to charities. This is the worst type of political argument. You’ve let 20 years of right wing propaganda color your thinking. You realize many expresdients have these…

So is the issue the scale of the Clinton Foundation? Lots of candidates and elected officials are related to non-profit charitable foundations. Does Michelle Obamas charitable work threaten the integrity of our executive branch?

Sure, it saves a few “lives” but it *appears* inappropriate!