This article is completely obnoxious. I'm sorry you feel attacked, but your self-conscious justifications are painful to read. You say, with alarm: "What if he had slip [sic] off the bed?" Lady, you don't think you could get tired enough to fall asleep with your baby in your arms if you were bottle feeding? …

You're funny. I don't sweat or smell (except my feet). I wash bras maybe twice a year. My socks on the other hand, need critical washing every time.

Yes, but you are thinking from a particularly Western perspective. Condoms aren't so great if your partner beats you for suggesting them, because they think if you want to use condoms then you are a prostitute or a witch.

needs help? you read the article, right? it sounds like he's tried to "get help" in about three dozen ways. sadly, not everything can be helped away into oblivion.

I really don't think that encouraging millions of teenagers to post scantily-clad pictures of themselves helps us move toward a body revolution. Sorry.

I had a croissant for breakfast. And I'm gay.

You're right, at least in the way surrogacy is carried out today. I suppose you could create a legal version of IVF under Ryan's personhood bill, but you would have to only create one embryo at a time and implant it every time. This would bring the pregnancy rate wayyy down and would not make the procedure…

Seems like a big issue to me. Especially since Paul Ryan's personhood bill would have made surrogacy illegal, making Tagg and his wife criminals.

No, it doesn't have to be pro-choice. They can write whatever they want in it, whether it ends up being legally binding or not.

"The more comments on a user has" ?

Seriously — the last time I saw a presentation by Loren Cameron was the 1990s. NOW this is suddenly controversial?

Jeezy Chreezy, is that his only shirt!?

And let us not forget that Julie Goodridge is NOT the adoptive mother of their daughter. She gave birth to her.

I totally agree that diet sodas are just as bad, by the way. Regulating people's self-harming behavior is just a totally fascinating topic to me. Maybe Bloomberg should commission a peer reviewed study? I haven't read all the backup data on the ban.

I hear you. I actually consider myself fairly libertarian so I don't know why the soda ban doesn't bother me. I think I am sort of fascinated to see the results. It's hard to only make new policies that you *know* will work in advance, you know?

Not to troll, but the definition of hypoglecemia is low blood sugar. What you said was "I can just feel my blood sugar drop...before I pass out." I was just trying to describe the symptoms you yourself mentioned. I stand by my statement that soda is not a healthy way to raise blood sugar, for whatever reason. I…

How it works: Reach into your closet and remove the crap that's been gathering dust. Swap it for something with bed bugs. BOOM.

Nope, not according to studies. The majority of people drink what is in front of them and don't get refills. That's the entire theory behind this experiment of limiting cup sizes.

Yes, the government does actually have that right. That's what health departments do. Were you this upset by the trans fat ban? Do you even live in New York?

No, most psychological studies prove you wrong on this one. In general, people finish what is in front of them and do not bother to get up to order refills or buy additional servings. If you put 16 oz in front of them, they drink that, same with 44 ounces. It's a psychological compulsion. That's the entire theory…