Yeah, this game would be a bit crap if it was like real life.
QQXQXL123
qqxqxl123
I would be willing to bet $50 that the B-52 is still in service after the B-21 has retired. Anyone care to take it?
I guess you’re an old too, then? I miss Space Quest.
The actual law is here:
Porsche could quite easily use these for “continuation” cars; at the very least it’ll be perfect for building classic race cars (like the recent E-Type Jaguars) but there are some routes for Porsche to get these on the road.
Miasma is one of my favourite words!
What I’m thinking right now is Goatse. It can’t be unseen.
It’s the Ferrari’s fault. It’s a public road during Touristfahrten, and the rule on a public road is “stop in what you can see”.
We have a 92% detection rate on murders in the UK, so that would make an equivalent number .543 per 100,000 people, or if we round it to three significant digits (as did the source material I pulled the figure from) 0.05 per 100,000 - exactly the same number.
Do you own a red hat that says “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” on it?
0.9 per 100,000 people in the UK, and 3.9 per 100,000 people in the USA. Statistically speaking the other options for murdering are much more popular in the UK.
Because we’re talking about guns, perhaps?
No, that’s just the murder rate, I specifically excluded accidents. If I’d included the accidental deaths and suicides it would have been 10.54 per 100,000 compared to 0.23 in the UK, still a two orders of magnitude difference.
The same applies here in the UK, except that makes the rate basically zero here.
I can go one better - the Rover SD1. Everywhere else:
We get around 40 gun murders a year, which if you multiply out is about 0.05 gun murders per 100,000 people. In the US it’s about 3.5 per 100,000 people. You are around 70 times more likely to be murdered with a gun in the USA than in the UK.
Lucky that the floor didn’t blow off the dyno cell, I guess.
Never played Half Life 2, but I see you mention that someone accidentally time-travelled? It sort of stands to reason that you could use that exact same mechanism to save Eli.
It’ll be worse. The silly looking narrow rear wing had a point - the turbulence was narrower than the front track of the car behind which reduced the amount of turbulence that hit the front wing of the following car. The new rear wings will fire turbulent air straight at the front wing of a following car, which will…