qqxqxl123
QQXQXL123
qqxqxl123

Yes, I guess the truth is always alluring.

So why doesn’t it disagree with Plessy? Go on, show me where the judges disagree with Plessy.

Which I did explain above. The ruling that effectively struck down Plessy was extremely carefully worded to avoid disagreeing with Plessy, which had to happen because the court was bound by the Plessy precedent. Dumbfuck.

“I been wrong”?

No, I just know how to read. Find where it says in that transcript that the judges decided that Plessy erred in law. I dare you.

The precedent stands, but the refinement to it rendered Plessy impotent. If you can’t see that then you’re even more of a dumber fuck than I thought you were. Dumbfuck.

You didn’t read it, did you? Find me a sentence, any sentence in Brown where the ruling says that Plessy had erred in law. Here’s the transcript.

Yes, I have read them, and I have explained every time that you hadn’t understood them properly. I have shown you at least a half dozen arguments from lawyers, professors and jurists from across common law jurisdictions in the US, the UK and other countries showing how precedent works but apparently the word of a

Sorry, but that’s horseshit.

Double Post

No, you aren’t saying the same thing. You said “no bearing”.

Why would I want to change what I’m saying when I’m correct?

You said:

I know some insults that aren’t “dumbfuck”, so there’s that.

Which I have done too. It’s no big deal.

All of those are defined by statute (laws instituted by the state). There’s an interesting interplay between statute and common law in the way that the common law can and cannot be applied across jurisdictions due to modification and abrogation of the common law by statute.

So Castle Doctrine, from English Common Law, is valid in US Courts? How can that be? Is there some mechanism whereby a US court looks at the case law of another jurisdiction and says “that’s a good idea”?

I thought you said you don’t have common law in the US?

Your course isn’t in law, is it?

Castle Doctrine...Do you know what the full doctrine is?