I doubt the Adderall sale would be admissible in a real trial.
I doubt the Adderall sale would be admissible in a real trial.
Defense lawyers are there to advocate on behalf of their clients no matter how guilty they might be. Prosecutors are supposed to be "impartial seekers of truth."
Maybe it wasn't a false note. Did anyone else notice during the kiss when Naz flashbacked to Andrea one image was of her lying face down, lifeless, with stab marks on her back. I don't remember seeing this image when Naz discovered her body in episode 1. Maybe it means it wasn't the 1st time he glimpsed her dead…
Sure you identified the right guy?
Maybe the cat symbolizes some sort of lost innocence.
I agree. It's the defense's job is to look for any way to create doubt. Can't really blame the police for thinking they had an open and shut case—it certainly appeared that way.
Her job is to get her client off. Not to "win" verbal encounters with nuts.
Box seems to have some vague—very vague— misgivings about Naz's guilt which he knows have no rational basis. Checking Naz's locations during the night of the murder is part of making the case against Naz—but even if Box is harboring some doubts: based on what he knows what does the ownership of Andrea's house have to…
I think maybe the writers were signalling Freddy was a false friend to Naz.
"Table setting"? Did anyone else notice Freddy told Naz "I'll make you a proper convict.. Calvin spoke identical words to Naz before turning on him.
Not really. Based on the information available to the police & DA Naz seems so clearly guilty & the case against him seems so overwhelming I doubt any prosecutor or detective would feel impelled to run a title search on Andrea's home.
The photographer noticed the backdoor didn't lock properly.