You really are new to the Gawker scene aren't you?
You really are new to the Gawker scene aren't you?
OHHH I get it... you're being sarcastic.
Did you see that? That thing that went right over your head.
Why is it you guys keep insisting that Google+ is an outright failure, when all present data seems to dispute you? Google TV is doing pretty damn well too, the new Vizio box sold out its pre-orders in under 24 hours, not bad for a failure. Android tablets sell pretty well, not as well as the iPad and Ill give you…
In any other article I would agree. But this article is weak to begin with and all of the conversation is drivel based on that fact. I could post this image in reply to ever comment here and it would be warranted.
Normally I would have called you out on that type of comment, BUT after the pointless trolling that was his comment, it flat out deserves a pass.
And a poor example at that...
I get the joke and the video was funny... thing is Casey comes across as just plain old butt-hurt, and annoying. Maybe Im wrong, or maybe he needs to work on his sarcasm skills.
Really Dozer? Shouldn't you reserve that comment for Gizmodo themselves? If they post up anti-google flamebait, its pretty obvious you are going to get an apple based retort. The iBias on this site is pretty well established after all.
That looks to be monitoring client access. There is no data on whether the person is opening a gmail account through their iphone or Outlook client... Data is not entirely relevant to the discussion, though the users original comment does leave it vague and open to interpretation.
Yea but your thinly veiled fanboyism is forgetting one important thing...
Im tired from a day at work so Im not going to write a novelet in response, no offence intended towards your remark. In truth I tend to normally reply with such novelets myself. Ill try to sum up my argument pretty quickly.
Yes, but following design aesthetics is an accepted practice in the automobile industry. In fact its pretty common place in all industries.
Yes, but following design aesthetics is an accepted practice in the automobile industry. In fact its pretty common place in all industries.
HOLY CRAP THE COMMENT SYSTEM WHEN CRAZY!!! Sorry about the Quad-Reply.
Im sorry but its pretty easy to look back over time and point out all of the different designs in smartphones and claim different ways to make them. The truth however is that EVERY generation of smart phone all had similar design aesthetics for each specific generation. This is because of one simple fact, design…
Im sorry but its pretty easy to look back over time and point out all of the different designs in smartphones and claim different ways to make them. The truth however is that EVERY generation of smart phone all had similar design aesthetics for each specific generation. This is because of one simple fact, design…
Im sorry but its pretty easy to look back over time and point out all of the different designs in smartphones and claim different ways to make them. The truth however is that EVERY generation of smart phone all had similar design aesthetics for each specific generation. This is because of one simple fact, design…
Im sorry but its pretty easy to look back over time and point out all of the different designs in smartphones and claim different ways to make them. The truth however is that EVERY generation of smart phone all had similar design aesthetics for each specific generation. This is because of one simple fact, design…
You must not follow the automobile industry, because car designs are very often lifted from another manufactures design.