No, you being upset by this is.

That’s not even slightly accurate.

She’s not a carbon copy of Luke. You, however, are a perfect clone of a giant turd.

You’re one of those people who really have no idea what happened in TFA.

It’s foolish to assume that he’s assigning sandwiches as the problem. Brooks provided a good example that could have been more artfully described. That’s a failure of writing in not creating the proper setting.

Just read the article in question. The caricature in the parody is inaccurate and seems to miss the point of what Brooks is saying. But hey, this is the website that ran an article that dismissed the appropriation of basic bitch as something other than lower/middle class identity insecurity.

Jezebel is home to both classism and anti-intellectualism, so I don’t get what layer this supposed to fit into.

A lot of people don’t understand the geographical limits of the middle east, confuse central asia with the middle east while missing the fact that Arabization ended at Iraq.

Sex really isn’t all that interesting. I encourage teens to explore more of the world and not get caught up in romance.

No, thanks. I totally get what you’re saying here. There’s just such a huge variance in what people mean when they say “fuckboy” that it’s sometimes hard to understand what’s being communicated.

This characterization is really inaccurate and foolish. It’s in line with the “you’re just jealous argument.”

No. That show was straight up trash.

The writing was just as bad. Aziz goes hard sticking up for middle/upper-middle class mainstream mediocrity.

I hope Rey doesn’t hook up with anyone.

What would make a quality fuckboy? I guess I’m really confused what’s being said here.

I don’t think it matters. It’s really just a curiosity. Your average native speaker of one particular language isn’t going to know the ins-and-outs of every language. A lot of native speakers will probably not know the origin of many loan words (or care). Many other words have crept into English from Arabic, bint,…

The general editorial vibe around is very much accepting dressed-up rightist rhetoric as emancipatory.

I think you missed this statement I made:

Yeah, I’m making my way through these comments. What I meant by my comment is that the ideas being expressed really are not leftist and there is a segment politics that is described as leftist, self-identifies as leftist, yet their politics are solidly on the right. These politics are a spiral downward in which there…

Purist right more than left. There’s an uncomfortable intersection occurring right now.