I’m sure no woman in the BLM movement has ever committed a crime or will ever commit one. They are saints by definition.
I’m sure no woman in the BLM movement has ever committed a crime or will ever commit one. They are saints by definition.
Translation - #notallfeminists. Usually works particularly well with #notallmen.
Have you seen the movie ‘Obvious Cild’? The protagonist is going to have an abortion and she doesn’t inform the father of her unborn child about it beforehand. She only confides to her best friend who goes with her to the abortion clinic. Guess what, both the movie and the plot were highly lauded around here. Look it…
So, a woman deciding to tie her tubes should be required to ‘talk through major life decisions’ and if she didn’t, her partner would have the right to complain about it? So you wouldn’t call this guy a dick then and worse things and enthusiastically support her decision b/c ‘it’s her body’? It’s HIS body and HIS…
What’s the alternative for her? Telling him that she wants more children and forcing him to procreate at gunpoint? No means no. I’m sure you’ve heard this one before.
I gave you already a few examples on that thread of good shows with female leads that are highly rated by both men and women and also examples of crappy shows that have been downrated by men. If you are too lazy/stupid to search for yourself, I can’t/won’t help you.
Wasn’t Hannah Montana a show mainly geared towards young teens an preteen girls? I doubt tha many men have rated that show lol. BTW women rated HM with a 5.5, men with 4.0. 5.5 is pretty crappy/mediocre imo.
Obviously not. Commercials reinforcing gendered stereotypes for women (raising children, doing household chores etc.) are criticized on social media while commercials depicting the ‘stupid husband’ are considered funny. Don’t believe me? Just follow this thread.
“The story here isn’t that there is some secret cabal of neckbeards going around downvoting women-centric shows and movies”
....and in any western society they are free to do so.
The headline suggests (‘he said’), that this conversation had somehow been corroborated by witnesses/audio/video recording, yet she claims, that all this allegedly took place during a private conversation. Hell, if I wanted to sue for discrimination, this is pretty much what I would do. All she wants is to settle for…
Breaking news, remember the ‘92 campaign with the ‘buy one, get one for free’? Well it’s the same thing all over again, only with the genders reversed. You vote for Hillary, you will also get Bill, for better or for worse.
If you have crappy shows like SATC or all the Shonda Rhimes dreck, you get crappy ratings, when you have good shows with one or more strong female leads, like Jessica Jones or OITNB, the difference between the average male vote and the average female vote is a lot smaller, pretty much like the average male/female…
Yes, seriously.
That is one of the most offensive commercials I can remember. Next time you see a commercial, where a half naked woman is selling a product with her body and you ask yourself why this tired sexist trope of ‘sex sells’ still exists, that’s me every time I see a ‘stupid husband’ commercial. The ones were guys are…
I agree that Vogue or Elle have a primarily female readership and it looks like they are going to continue to have that readership in the future, regardeless of all those cover stories written by men. That won’t drive their readership away nor will it gain them more readers. On the other hand, with the 24/7…
She has the right position now, b/c the wrong position became untenable within her party. She would switch that position in a heartbeat again, if it guaranteed her any measureable electoral success.
Correlation or causation?