So its not a free speech concern for a university to permit a violent mob to shut down speech because the speaker is free to speak elsewhere? Interesting theory. Now apply it to something like the BDS movement and tell me your thoughts.

Of course assault weapons are dangerous.......listen to these misleading anecdotes (hint, more people are killed in each by illegal aliens than by assault weapons)

Maybe read up...........at Middlebury the protesters assaulted a professor and barred people from entering the speech. That’s not speech or protest. That’s mob violence.

So you’d be okay with right wing protesters using threats of violence and actual violence to shut down: (i) the Nation of Islam, (ii) Socialist speakers, (iii) members of the Weather Underground, (iv) Communist speakers, (v) Islamist speakers?

Apartheid state. Jesus you’re an idiot.

You think the Walton’s keep their money in secret vaults somewhere waiting for inflation? No. That money is, in large measure, invested in new companies, ideas and ventures. How else do you think she gets richer. Its not simply by sitting back, she puts the money to work making more money. Sure, some of it is in…

Pretty amazing you do a whole article on this but fail to mention that Reid, Schumer and Biden had told GHWB and GWB separately and publicly that they would not under any circumstances confirm a Supreme Court nominee in Bush’s last year. And Schumer was the worst because he said it in 2007 when there was well over a…