weight for it..

“However, the negative stories of the festival seem to hold little wait with people...”

There’s regulated percentages that wipers have to cover as well:

They need to step up and do something cool. Maybe something like the Mercedes mono-wiper that reaches further towards the corners? Heck, even an opposed wiper systems like what you used to see on 3rd & 4th gen Grand Caravans would be better than this. Anything but this seems like a better option.

Emotional Support Chevy C10 for eye bleach purposes. 

Ooooh, black, white, gray, gray, blue, red... Really went out on a limb there Toyota.

But to be clear: this isn’t an “attack on Black men” as some online have purported it to be.

Its a travesty that the US doesn’t get the yellow that was used on the debut car.

Because we are (were?) talking about this case where the criminal made a claim for stand your ground (so I assume it’s an affirmative defense) and the jury clearly didn’t think it applied. I then explained why I thought the jury made the right call.

Where did I disagree with what you? Because it seems like you think I'm disagreeing with you.

That the dude who ran through the stop light and almost hit a bunch of people likely would have trouble claiming a right to stand his ground (and the jury in this case seemed to agree).

? I think he’s guilty and should stay in prison. So I don’t get comparing me to Abbot on this.

So moving forward we’re just gonna skip due process and Judge Dredd everything

Greg Abbott looks like a life sized Sesame Street Muppet.

The same places where “stand your ground” is a thing also don’t consider running your car over protesters, especially black or BLM protesters, a crime. That’s the intent, regardless of the letter of the law. Black, BLM, and left-leaning people don’t have any legal right to defend themselves in red states. By the…

Abbot, Trump, DeSantis, Hailey...it’s all Republican politics at its core and there’s not a single decent politician among them! Gov. Abbott, with this shit, understands what the MAGA movement is all about. With the Black Lives Matter tag attached to the victim, Abbott knows this move will play well among the MAGA…

Yes. But the legality of them generally requires you not to be committing a crime that would give the people that you are standing your ground to have a legally valid reason to feel you are threatening them.

Still one of the coldest scenes in cinema history.

The only thing I’m taking away from this is, Abbott is saying that guy should’ve had a gun instead of a skateboard, killed Rittenhouse on the spot, and then everything would’ve been kosher.

Seems clearer than the Rittenhouse trial. Guy directly endangered people, who came to seemingly see what the fuck was going on; and then without attempting to flee or deescelate the situation that he caused, he started shooting at people. The jury sounds dead right from my understanding.