How about educate men not to sexually harass and assault women.

Ugh, I though the original take was bad. Takes out Megaphone: THESE WOMEN WERE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED AND RAPED. HOW WOULD THIS MAKE THINGS EASIER OR MORE STRAIGHTFORD. HARVEY, IS THAT YOU? “Cookies” was conflating and victim blaming. Acknowledging that someone’s a victim RESTORES power to them.

This is such a bad take, it’s difficult to even engage with. Translation: “She seems slutty, so I guess she had it coming to her.” Dude, these women were systemically sexually assaulted and raped. Don’t you even dare place them in the same category as Wahlberg, the perpetrator of violent racist assaults. The people…

Oh yeah they are. Jost is a writer on the show.

Jost, is that you?!?

Please clarify as to whom “he” refers? If Jost, nope, ‘cause he’s a misogynist loser. :)

OMG, I KNEW ONE OF YOU GUYS WOULD SHOW UP!

Also, I hate to go into snark, but you answered your own question. “Rarely the one making misogynist jokes” does make one a misogynist.

He’s the co-anchor (also, one of the writers)—-he’s complicit. Plus, there’s Jost’s constant “Bernie would have won” (yeah, thanks, really helping at the moment, considering I’m pretty sure he didn’t bother dragging his bum over to the voting booth). Oh, yeah, and those transgender “jokes.” Che is a much more…

Yeah, so over his and Jost’s misogyny.

Excuse me, have you ever met a Masterpiece Theater fan? I will watch ANYTHING with my Little Dorrit!!!!

I suppose I could google this, but was the Spike Jonez video criticized for the moment where she beats up a black man, because....seriously?

Oh, and Seacrest.

I don’t have time tonight to back through close readings of specific columns, but his general antagonism towards women, particularly lesbians. I also don’t think he takes into account structural powers and exploitation in regards to his championing of “sex work.” This is all done through the guise of a painfully…

Seriously. Example A: Dan Savage.

Academia is such a cesspit of harassment. I know of so many habitual and longtime predators being actively protected not just by their departments, but the university on the whole.

THANK YOU.

“I have nothing to gain by this.....” Seriously, that statement, what a punch to the gut.

Ok, I think I’ve reached my “trying to understand the other side” quota until next year.

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again, 99.9% sure DG is a Trumpy.