@OMG! British Dinosaur!: He's a Minnesota fan.

I thought that was amusing, actually. Much less horrifying-yet-cannot-look-away than I was expecting.

@Chilli: Exactly why I would love to have a 3d printer... with the "soul implantation" module included.

It seems to me that the Commander Kelly's comment sits out of context. It reads very much like there was more that he said and that has not been reported.

@USB_Humping_Dog: Let's see what happens if we complete the thought:

@Icarus.: Justin Bieber's equally evil twin.

@hostile-17: I love fun typos!

@NamelessFragger: Whoops. Got the model wrong - it's the Travelmate C310. Hah! Can't even remember my own computer model number....

Don't mince words, Sam, tell us how you really feel!

Could be worse, IMHO - they could have found this on a transvaginal ultrasound.

@Killjoy: Why? Because they won't fit up there?

@TheLostVikings: Hah! Well, that's decidedly low-tech, and has some issues regarding wear and sensitivity - but then don't we all?

In the old days, they might have used Finger to do this.

@ForTheLulz: It might, but I worry that it might be laggy.

@Arggh! there goes a...snake a snake!: Your comment was good. Your suggestion for a game: excellent, thanks!

@Jones Foyer: Cintiq is a Wacom platform, right? So the pressure sensitivity is based on the difference in capacitance built into the pen. The harder you press, the lower the capacitance (I think, could be backwards) which changes the electro-magnetic relationship between the stylus and the surface.

@romevi04: ...of blessed memory.

@MacAttack: Yes, that would be a step up. Not quite the same as emulating, say, charcoal or a pastel, but good from a brush standpoint.

@zeroprime: Oh, believe me, I have - especially the Slate, which will likely be my next computer. But that's a Wacom-based solution, and it's inductive instead of capacitive. So pressure-sensitivity has been there for a long time.

Better. Not perfect, but better.