They’re talking bullshit. My company designed their advertising campaign; it has precisely jack shit to do with promoting personal beliefs. And I’ve never felt as slimed as when I worked with these people, and I’ve worked with some of the most reprehensible people in Congress and MRAs.

Don’t like 99% of defenses against rape accusations amount to calling the accuser a liar? Unless it’s a dark alley and the defense is that the accuser mis-recognized the perpetrator’s face.

Is it awful for people accused of rape to mount any defense?

Except her protest did not name him. She did not yell “hey, this dude, he’s the one who did it, ruin his life” she just said that the system had failed her her unnamed rapist was freely attending the school. That’s pretty restrained.

which was not only silent, but actively and knowingly supported attacks on Paul Nungesser

She never named him. She gave the police his name when she filed a report. Then it became public record. But, from what I read in that Daily Beast article, by his own admission, no one on campus recognized him, most had no idea who he was. Yes, people called for his expulsion, but it was never going to happen. He…

Rapetopia! Sounds swell!

They didn’t determine him as “innocent” at all! They determined him as “not responsible” which is way different. I’m not sure how many legs this lawsuit has to stand on.

Columbia University senior Paul Nungesser filed suit against the school yesterday, alleging that it refused to protect him from the harassment and hostile learning environment created by fellow student Emma Sulkowicz’s rape allegations against him

Well, you can defend against slander by proving the statement true. So, if he sues her for that she can basically put on a case to prove he did it (at a much lower burden of proof than a criminal trial).

Ugh, this wannabe victim. Riding the rape-accusation train to GLORY. Now look at her. She’s got everything! A face with a mouth! College! A mattress! Some people who don’t like this precious male on her behalf! WHAT NEXT?! WHAT ARE WE GOING TO GIVE THIS LIAR NEXT?!

It is about Columbia University as an institution, which was not only silent, but actively and knowingly supported attacks on Paul Nungesser, after having determined his innocence, legitimizing a fiction.

I am nearly 100% positive she never named him in any of her demonstrations or her art piece. I think I remember his name coming out when someone leaked all the paperwork from their university “legal” proceedings regarding the assault. That or he was dumb enough to point the fingers at himself.

You should just let people shit all over your reputation and lie about you because of some bigger principle? What is the bigger principle here exactly?

Probably because even if a judge ruled in his favor, he wouldn’t get a lot of money out of a college student. Columbia, however, is another matter entirely.

Yea remember the woman who did the whole write up that published those messages? She was like “well she was facebook messaging him so it couldnt have been rape!!”.

yeah, i would never expect such a shady move from a lawyer

“We already know that she cleverly crafted a story, and rode it to celebrity on the back of someone found not responsible.”

Gross. They mention in the Indian Country Today article that many of them will stay and take the shitty treatment because they need the job. I recently watched Reel Injun on Netflix, and it’s appalling that Hollywood can still get away with such blatant disrespect and racism. But people will tell them “Lighten up!…

wait i’m sorry

Right? It’s not like we live in the 1800s and no video exists of her teenage assholery. But then again, lying when the truth is plainly obvious is a frequent Kardashian-Jenner ploy.