Sounds like you’re feeding their sadness, despair and cynicism, you irresponsible fuck.
Sounds like you’re feeding their sadness, despair and cynicism, you irresponsible fuck.
What are rights of illegal immigrants?
You’re an angry simpleton if you think they’re going to kill it and just say “good luck everyone.”
As teacher, an influential shaper of young minds, why would you forecast such bleak things..
Teaching moment suggestion for all of you helplessly wringing your hands:
Why on Earth would you say such things? We have no idea what will be in the ACA fix, and so on and so on.
Historical mistake? What a foolishly presumptuous think to say. He hasn’t even been sworn in yet.
Racisim is state of mind.
Let me help you our here.
OK. Truth time. Who read the headline and became aroused?
(Handshake)
No, in fact. I am not opposed to all regulations—no one is. But I am in favor of a review to ensure that current regulations are in fact necessary, don’t produce market distortions, and meet reasonable cost/benefit tests.
What’s simplistic is your apparent belief that innovation won’t happen unless there is a government mandate.
I see that now. I think a review is probably not a bad thing. The EPA can certainly be downsized...there are so many redundancies with state agencies...
With the technologies that we have today (and those in development, I might add), I don’t think safety, emissions, fuel economy and consumer preferences can all come together and intersect with current CAFE standards. The VW TDI’s represented to the closest thing...but alas....
What a simplistic thought.
100%.
Is Trump talking about repealing fuel efficiency standards, not emissions.
Emissions and fuel economy are not related. No one is talking have repealing the former.
“Not in their best interests.” According to whom? For me a Chevy Suburban is in my best interest. Who are you to say its not?